Pole-to-pole Flight Finds CO2 ‘Piling Up’ over the Arctic

By | January 30, 2009

  • January 30, 2009 at 11:29 am
    Frank says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    What a crock of baloney…who are these scientists and what data are they measuring against to determine what is the correct amount of co2. What history do they have to determine the correct levels of co2 , past 10 years, past 1000 years, past million years? Are we to assume they know? Maybe there is no correct level or amount maybe it just changes as everything we know does.

  • January 30, 2009 at 2:40 am
    Taylor says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I agree. It’s a giant sack of baloney. The real goal of these global warming alarmists is global socialism.

  • January 30, 2009 at 2:49 am
    Mike says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The appropriate amount of CO2 is whatever Al Gore says is the appropriate amount.

  • January 30, 2009 at 3:03 am
    Bong Master says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    LOL – they spent $4.5 million in three weeks flying over the poles, with stops in Hawaii, in a flying bong! They still have four more junkets scheduled. Where is the money coming from for this Mile High Club excursion?

    They further stated, “Much of this may have to do with yearly biological changes in plants…Forests in the North absorb carbon dioxide in the summer and release it in the winter when leaves fall off and rot.” And, then, “There’s a strong need to understand what the forests and oceans are doing now so we can predict whether or not they’ll continue to protect (us) in the future.”

    Let’s see, there is a killer asteroid heading our way, which may or may not crash into us in 2023. If it barely misses us in 2023, it is certain to hit us 7 years later. Astrophysists are studying a possible way to draw the asteroid away from the earth, but there is no funding to take the plan forward. Yet, we allow $4.5 million to finance a joy ride to determine whether the forests and oceans will continue to protect us? – LOL!!

  • January 30, 2009 at 4:34 am
    Granola says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Gawd, you guys are such haters. Sorry that some of us actually care about how our earth will be for our children and grandchildren.

    And I’m REALLY tired of this habit on IJ with labeling everything you don’t believe in as “socialism”. Grow up already.

  • January 31, 2009 at 4:42 am
    Bong Master says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Tsk, tsk, sounds like someone had stale granola this morning and maybe missed their nap time.

    Nola, why not sit yourself down, take a couple of long hits off the bong (be sure to inhale – we won’t tell), and imagine yourself staring at this huge object in the sky 14 years from now. Now imagine yourself reaching over and picking up a copy of Nature from 2013 discussing the shifting of gases in the atmosphere, and the consensus amongst those who spend their careers studying expelled gas that the forests and oceans will be here to protect that arse, which is beginning to shake in fear as the asteroid tracks its way to your world.

    $4.5 million for a series of joy rides and $0 funding for the asteroid?

    Oh, yeah, we critics are real haters.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*