I usually don’t post anything but this article compels me to. Is this what the IPCC and the MET office produce after their scandal. I’d like to see their data but they more that likely won’t make it available either. This is allot of crap. If the worls cools it’s due to man, if the world warms that is also due to man. I am not going to worry about .75 degrees over 100 years, and THEY say the sun has NO effect. This must be how they justify the billions they get to do their research. It’s all about the money
Amen! I agree that this report is man made. Money accomplishes many things even a man made weather report. The question is: What do you want the weather report to say? With that answer we will find the science to affirm that conclusion.
It’s a good thing that the word “confirms” is in quotation marks in the article title. Doing so is generally understood as the word having questionable meaning. These guys haven’t confirmed anything except their desire to continue having millions or billions more in “research” funds pour in so that they can manipulate their “conclusions” to match whatever their sugar daddies want them to be.
Word to the “Met Office,” the IPCC, Al Gore, et. al.: just drop it, O.K.? Until recently, only some well informed people who refused to believe the lies and distortions of the mainstream press saw “global warming” as the money-making scam that it is. Now the cat’s out of the bag and everyone knows it. The issue is dead, leave it alone and go on to your next con game.
If the Insurance Journal was sincere about this issue, they would present all the facts, instead of selective information. Why they not report on such huge news about the falsified “global warming” data? The reason is, it doesn’t fit the political agenda of the editors who have so much invested in global warming they don’t want to embarrass themselves about being wrong. They will desperately make story of anything they can get their hands on, including more information from false scientist.
Really, they have proof? Well goodness me, now there’s a remarkable thing. Perhaps these fabulously prescient experts would be so good as to explain just how it is that CO2 levels were higher than today during all of the previous ice ages and how, despite the current inexorable rise in CO2, global temperatures are currently in decline?
How long will it be before the ‘king’ realises he is actually naked?
I usually don’t post anything but this article compels me to. Is this what the IPCC and the MET office produce after their scandal. I’d like to see their data but they more that likely won’t make it available either. This is allot of crap. If the worls cools it’s due to man, if the world warms that is also due to man. I am not going to worry about .75 degrees over 100 years, and THEY say the sun has NO effect. This must be how they justify the billions they get to do their research. It’s all about the money
Amen! I agree that this report is man made. Money accomplishes many things even a man made weather report. The question is: What do you want the weather report to say? With that answer we will find the science to affirm that conclusion.
It’s a good thing that the word “confirms” is in quotation marks in the article title. Doing so is generally understood as the word having questionable meaning. These guys haven’t confirmed anything except their desire to continue having millions or billions more in “research” funds pour in so that they can manipulate their “conclusions” to match whatever their sugar daddies want them to be.
Word to the “Met Office,” the IPCC, Al Gore, et. al.: just drop it, O.K.? Until recently, only some well informed people who refused to believe the lies and distortions of the mainstream press saw “global warming” as the money-making scam that it is. Now the cat’s out of the bag and everyone knows it. The issue is dead, leave it alone and go on to your next con game.
In honor of this b.s. data, I have decided to drive the rest of this month with no catalytic converter and cut off as many Prius drivers as possible.
If the Insurance Journal was sincere about this issue, they would present all the facts, instead of selective information. Why they not report on such huge news about the falsified “global warming” data? The reason is, it doesn’t fit the political agenda of the editors who have so much invested in global warming they don’t want to embarrass themselves about being wrong. They will desperately make story of anything they can get their hands on, including more information from false scientist.
From the five comments so far, IJ must have a very intelligent readership. The stupid burns.
From the first five comments, IJ must have a very intelligent readership (that was sarcasm).
The next time you guys are sick, I suggest visiting a plumber rather than relying on mere science and your regular science-trained physician.
These people have a serious case of Dunning-Kruger syndrome but they don’t even realize it.
Really, they have proof? Well goodness me, now there’s a remarkable thing. Perhaps these fabulously prescient experts would be so good as to explain just how it is that CO2 levels were higher than today during all of the previous ice ages and how, despite the current inexorable rise in CO2, global temperatures are currently in decline?
How long will it be before the ‘king’ realises he is actually naked?