All of these ‘experts’ in the Fake News industry have no clue as to the reason these events are becoming more common, and automatically use them as justification/ support for their Global Warming Hoax.
The simple fact that R Maddow misses in her observation of six such events in the Houston/ coastal TX area is the increase in exposures that drive up the costs associated with each cat event. Cat models can easily produce the growth in exposures over the time period she used to demonstrate the increase.
You state Maddow’s observation misses increases in exposures and rising costs because of that, but the article doesn’t even talk about money once. She simply said The Gulf of Mexico has experienced six “100 year storms” since 1989. Do you disagree with the statement she actually made?
All of these ‘experts’ in the Fake News industry have no clue as to the reason these events are becoming more common, and automatically use them as justification/ support for their Global Warming Hoax.
The simple fact that R Maddow misses in her observation of six such events in the Houston/ coastal TX area is the increase in exposures that drive up the costs associated with each cat event. Cat models can easily produce the growth in exposures over the time period she used to demonstrate the increase.
Here’s the link I referenced in my post, but forgot in my haste to hit enter and post the comment above….
https://news.grabien.com/story-montage-media-politicize-hurricane-harvey-blame-global-warmi
It looks incomplete, but works to bring you to the page. It is truncated by the origin website for some reason unbeknownst to me.
Sheriff Joe Bearpaio needs another cup of strong coffee. Bear culpa.
You state Maddow’s observation misses increases in exposures and rising costs because of that, but the article doesn’t even talk about money once. She simply said The Gulf of Mexico has experienced six “100 year storms” since 1989. Do you disagree with the statement she actually made?