Because she basically revenge suing him. Not that big of a stretch considering some of those non-sexual harassment harassment complaining I’ve seen lately.
So, what I’m reading is that she has potentially engaged in conducting unlicensed legal work in Wisconsin? Why is that not more broadly highlighted and what are the repercussions of that??
This woman is guilty of sexual harassment.
And how did you jump to that conclusion?
Because she basically revenge suing him. Not that big of a stretch considering some of those non-sexual harassment harassment complaining I’ve seen lately.
How do you equate “revenge suing” with sexual harassment?
So, what I’m reading is that she has potentially engaged in conducting unlicensed legal work in Wisconsin? Why is that not more broadly highlighted and what are the repercussions of that??