How is it that insurers who charged premium in the accident year based on costs that were allowed at the time, are now allowed to cut back benefits to those insureds who have ongoing claims?
There’s something about having legislators with no insurance comprehension writing laws or regs that affect insurance outcomes that just doesn’t sit well. There should be a mandatory training requirement for some of these people to hold office.
How is it that insurers who charged premium in the accident year based on costs that were allowed at the time, are now allowed to cut back benefits to those insureds who have ongoing claims?
There’s something about having legislators with no insurance comprehension writing laws or regs that affect insurance outcomes that just doesn’t sit well. There should be a mandatory training requirement for some of these people to hold office.
How is it that insurers who charged premium in the accident year based on costs that were allowed at the time, are now allowed to cut back benefits to those insureds who have ongoing claims?
There’s something about having legislators with no insurance comprehension writing laws or regs that affect insurance outcomes that just doesn’t sit well. There should be a mandatory training requirement for some of these people to hold office.
How is it that insurers who charged premium in the accident year based on costs that were allowed at the time, are now allowed to cut back benefits to those insureds who have ongoing claims?
There’s something about having legislators with no insurance comprehension writing laws or regs that affect insurance outcomes that just doesn’t sit well. There should be a mandatory training requirement for some of these people to hold office.