Copy of AIG Chairman Greenberg’s Retirement Letter

March 29, 2005

  • March 29, 2005 at 10:47 am
    Winston says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Mr. Chapman, you apparently are an independent and logical thinker.
    Thank you for your input.

    I still however am awaiting to cast my opinion on Evan with regard to ACE. At this point however, it does not seem at all promising for Evan Greenberg.

    COMPETITION IS A BEAUTIFUL THING.

  • March 30, 2005 at 12:25 pm
    Prem joshi says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Mr. Greenbergs has some body else write resignation letter for him.

    Hope he has not delegated important decsion making to some body else in past 25 years.. Is it a ploy to escape attention from federal authorities.

  • March 29, 2005 at 2:24 am
    jetski says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I wonder what Bois charged for this letter!

  • March 29, 2005 at 3:02 am
    NFOB says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    nothing hillary couldnt afford.
    lets see what the subpoenas turn up.
    maybe he’s as much of a con artist as the former 1st lady

  • March 29, 2005 at 3:35 am
    tom says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Long overdue, the end of the dynasty, is Evan not far behind..hope the door doesn’t hit him next

  • March 29, 2005 at 3:51 am
    Interesting says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I hope Spitzer moves onto other big fish in this industry – AIG is only one of many fish in the same sea. Aiming at the top is refreshing – the underlings usually do as they are told and take the fall while the whales prevail!

  • March 29, 2005 at 5:24 am
    John Chapman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    From everything I see and hear the Greenbergs run sweat shops. I will be glad to see all of them out the doors of Marsh, AIG & ACE.

  • March 30, 2005 at 12:49 pm
    Aaron Tikkoo says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Whatever be it, Mr. Greenberg is a stalwart – he is bigger than the brand AIG,though I always felt he is an untouchable

  • March 31, 2005 at 3:09 am
    Bill K. says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    A lot of people were thought of and considered themselves untouchable until Sheriff Spitzer came to town. Now they can’t get out fast enough or far enough. Appropriate time to be touring Asia and Europe!

  • April 1, 2005 at 8:53 am
    tom says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Someone ..please help me understand, why would a giant in the industry who single handedly built a global empire be forced out of HIS Company and now have all this presumed illegal/ corrupt activity come to light

    Greed,power, bad advice from trusted SECO boys,just good old stupidity with some greed and ego thrown in for good measure.

    It’s sad to to see Hank running with his leg caught in his *** !!

  • April 3, 2005 at 7:05 am
    Dan Jordan says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    As a shareholder of American General, I aquired AIG stock not by choice but by the acquistion. Other American General shareholders have been disappointed as we have seen no concern for shareholders by AIG senior management. It is time for Greenburg and all his insiders to go. All of their severence packages are unconsionable. They had no incentive to work for shareholders. It is time for new directors and management responsive to the stockholders.

  • April 4, 2005 at 3:10 am
    tom says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Read the Wall Street Journal today (Monday, April 4) – Hank Greenburg still just doesn’t get it!

  • April 29, 2005 at 6:51 am
    John says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I have always strongly believed in freedom of speech but also firmly supported one of the basic human rights that one is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Apparently AG Sptizer does not hold those same views, or so it seems. I am having difficulty understanding why a lawyer of Elliot’s statue prefers to prosecute, judge and sentence people in public before examining all the facts. Perhaps someone care to comment?



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*