Plaintiff Who Lost Pants Loses $54 Million Suit Against Dry Cleaner

By Lubna Takruri | June 27, 2007

  • June 27, 2007 at 10:36 am
    wudchuck says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    here again, it shows that society has no concern in clogging courts up with something ridiculous. what makes the matter worse, this was a judge/lawyer, whom knows better. he took the situation that was resolved to begin with and made matters worse. i think not only shud he disbarred, but definately repay all legal expenses for the cleaning company had to pay for his stupidity.

  • June 27, 2007 at 11:47 am
    McCordian says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I agree with Wudchuck. I think Pearson’s actions undermine our legal system, and if I were the judge presiding over the matter, I would’ve undoubtedly sanctioned Pearson for making frivilous (and ridiculous) claims that not only adversely effected the Chungs but burdened the court’s docket.

  • June 27, 2007 at 1:07 am
    DeMoss says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Until actions/penalties are envoked against those who file ridiculous claims and undermining our legal systems, these type of claims will continue to flood our court system. I too would have sanctioned Pearson for making such a frivilous claim. There are more important issues we need to be addressing, NOT a case about lost pants….

  • June 27, 2007 at 1:08 am
    Rich says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    And remember….i t’s 99% of the lawyers that give the rest a bad name!!!

  • June 27, 2007 at 1:11 am
    Power of the People says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I hope the next time there is an election someone steps up and saturates the media with this story – through ads, papers running-mates, and opposition or any other outlet that will bring this idiot to his knees.

    He should be ousted from his position as an abuse of the legal system.

    Too bad they can’t boot him out on his ears now – This is exactly what is wrong with this country

  • June 27, 2007 at 1:21 am
    Ray says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Don’t forget, he was an administrative law judge – not an elected position. Believe it or not, the position is based on merit – and he has just proved that he has no merit.

    Let’s hope that the Chief Administrative Law Judge does not renew his term.

  • June 27, 2007 at 1:28 am
    Get him outta there says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    What an idiot! Not only did he embarass himself, but the entire country in which he currently resides! I applaud the family that welcomes him back after the first time they reimbursed him $150 without a receipt and then this happened! What a MORON!! He has no business being on the bench & his decisions should be reviewed under intense scrutiny! Get him outta there!

  • June 27, 2007 at 1:30 am
    wudchuck says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I AGREE! he shud not get a renewal, and i hope that if he works for a law firm, they consider his attacking the economy for $54 million due to a lost pair of $30-50 pair of pants!….

    UM….maybe he shud work for the company for a year w/o wage since he wanted so much for the missing pants!! LOL!

  • June 27, 2007 at 2:08 am
    Dumb Founded says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I just can not believe that this case actually went to trial. This goes to prove that anyone can file any idiotic claim for any reason and waste every one’s time. That case should have been dismissed upon the filing. This guy should definitely be disbarred – HE HAS NO ETHICS – and afterall isn’t that the main code of law that lawyers must abide by?

  • June 27, 2007 at 2:12 am
    just an observation says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    do not forget that this individual has immense power. what he decides and rules on affects countless numbers of people. if there is a lesson to be learned it is that we have a lot of lawyers posing as judges and congressmen that have no business wielding the kind of power this man wields. can one even imagine what kind of justice he dispenses? as citizens, we have turned over our lives to individuals who put these people in positions of trust. why isn’t anyone going after the people who put this idiot in charge? they are the real villians of this whole stink. also, do not forget that 78 percent of all legislators are attorneys.

  • June 27, 2007 at 3:24 am
    Rich says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    How about calling that judge? He’s likely to be looking for work fairly soon. Big thing is to let him know right off the bat who’s going to be “wearing the pants” in the family.

  • June 27, 2007 at 4:13 am
    Hangman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Abuse of authority has been the cause of many a revolution in history. Is there an enterprising prosecutor that can find a case for inciting a revolution so we can hang this *******?

  • June 27, 2007 at 6:57 am
    I will join says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    From the looks of it, there are at least ten of us willing to join in censure this bozo. Hey, maybe Rosie will join in too?

  • June 28, 2007 at 7:12 am
    Mark P says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Agreed. Too often we overlook the importance of electing these judges. We have judges that grant light sentences to criminals when most of the voting population would impose the maximum penalties. Been to court lately? You’ve got about a 50/50 chance that the attorneys show-up for a scheduled case and the judges do nothing about it. Of course the date is rescheduled at the inconvenience and expense of everyone. We rarely have enough information about our judges when voting.

  • June 28, 2007 at 8:37 am
    Jane Logan says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    What I find most disturbing about this is his complete arrogance – he must feel he is above the law he swore to uphold. I agree his past decisions should be reviewed and current activity monitored closely until he can removed from the bench and disbarred. No one with such obvious mental problems should have control over any part of the legal system. This idiot clearly is not capable of making rational decisions, but is capable of causing great harm to the public if he is allowed to remain on the bench.

  • June 28, 2007 at 12:05 pm
    Gregg P. says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    It’s dissapointing that it wasn’t until the fifth paragraph of this AOL article that it’s mentioned that the plaintiff was a Judge.

  • June 29, 2007 at 8:53 am
    Mac says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    He was offered $12k to settle out of court, what a joke!

  • July 2, 2007 at 1:42 am
    blondie says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    What amazes me most is that the Chung family is willing to accept Judge Bozo back into their establishment.
    If anything positive can be taken from this rediculous story, it is their forgiveness. “Don’t let hate feed hate.” All of society needs to pay attention and follow their example.

  • September 20, 2007 at 7:27 am
    moks says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    an abusive lawyer/judge with a “divaish” act. not the appropriate person to hold a public office.

    onle a person with mental health problem can elevate this problem to such degree. i just wonder why he was appointed as a judge… there has to be a way of reviewing all the cases/verdicts he had handled. he is such an angry person.

    i like the moral of this incident – don’t let hate feed hate”



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*