Unum Group Reverses 42% of Reviewed Disability Claims

By Bill Poovey | May 2, 2008

  • May 2, 2008 at 10:51 am
    steve steele says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    are you saying both companies independently concluded you were not disabled?

  • May 2, 2008 at 4:48 am
    JAMES BENSON says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I GOT TURNED DOWN BY UNUM AND MET, ON A PERFECTLY LEGIT CLAIM BECAUSE MY LAWYER WAS AFRAID TO TAKE THEM ON. I RAN MY BUSINESS INTO THE GROUND BECAUSE I CANT THINK CLEARLY. I DONT KNOW IF THE REST OF MY COMMENTS GOT THROUGH, BUT I HOPE SO. I WELCOME ANY ADVICE.

  • May 2, 2008 at 6:21 am
    Earle says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    This conduct of UNUM is an absolute disgrace.A company that finally recognizes that 42% of its denied claims deserve to be reversed should go into a different business.What about prior years claims? Can they be trusted to not repeat this in the future ? I would not bet a client’s employees’ welfare on it.

    A Very Dissapointed Broker

  • May 6, 2008 at 5:37 am
    Matt says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Same on the brokers who sell products they don’t understand and take commissions they should not receive. Shame on the policy holders who think of these products as a lottery system. If both saw fit to deny a claim there was definitely a basis for the denial.

    There is enough inthe world for every mans needs but not enough for evry mans greed!!!!



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*