How about this: any nominations for the worst agency to work for? Keep it short, only give facts that you can back up, don’t be cruel.
I’ll start: Cottingham & Butler in Dubuque, IA. I had one review in 3 years, brought in a bunch of new revenue without recognition, was replaced by 2.5 people when I left. Was forced to sign document that I assumed liability for sales in states where I was not licensed after being told that they would not license me in all states where I had clients.
“I have been witnessing document destruction, concealment, and obstruction
of discovery by State Farm for many years in connection with my review of
internal claim practices documents of the insurer. I have accumulated
certain Exhibits which show the company’s goals and objectives for document
handling by its employees. The documents show close to 28 years of
intentional destruction, concealment and distortion of claim practices
records.”
In some cases, company executives did not keep records.
Jeff Marr, the attorney suing State Farm in Oklahoma, took sworn testimony
Sept. 6 from Rust. Topics included Rust’s Chairman’s Council, made up of top
State Farm executives. The group, which includes the company’s general
counsel, meets quarterly.
Marr was fishing for records of those meetings that he could subpoena for
his lawsuit.
“Certainly,” Marr asked Rust, “you keep records of the quarterly meetings
where the entire Chairman’s Council is present?”
“We have an agenda,” Rust said, “but minutes in that, no.”
“Why not?” Marr asked.
Rust replied, “Never felt a need to.”
Marr later asked, “Are there any written agendas that are available should I
choose to request them in the lawsuit?”
“I’m not sure what might be available,” Rust said.
Rust also said policyholders, who essentially own the private mutual
company, are not entitled to know what the Chairman’s Council discusses or
decides about litigation against State Farm, citing attorney-client
privilege.
Marr questioned why the company would withhold information from
policyholders, who own State Farm.
“Well, again,” said Rust (who has a law degree), “I’m not an expert in the
area, but I think as you find — even if I’m a shareholder in a publicly
traded company, there are things that are not — you know, I do not have
access to.”
Marr later asked if policyholders have a right to see documents from State
Farm’s investigation of Haag.
How about this: any nominations for the worst agency to work for? Keep it short, only give facts that you can back up, don’t be cruel.
I’ll start: Cottingham & Butler in Dubuque, IA. I had one review in 3 years, brought in a bunch of new revenue without recognition, was replaced by 2.5 people when I left. Was forced to sign document that I assumed liability for sales in states where I was not licensed after being told that they would not license me in all states where I had clients.
I concur, I had an interview with Cottingham awhile back, weirdest place I’ve ever been in.
Fye wrote in a Florida case
“I have been witnessing document destruction, concealment, and obstruction
of discovery by State Farm for many years in connection with my review of
internal claim practices documents of the insurer. I have accumulated
certain Exhibits which show the company’s goals and objectives for document
handling by its employees. The documents show close to 28 years of
intentional destruction, concealment and distortion of claim practices
records.”
In some cases, company executives did not keep records.
Jeff Marr, the attorney suing State Farm in Oklahoma, took sworn testimony
Sept. 6 from Rust. Topics included Rust’s Chairman’s Council, made up of top
State Farm executives. The group, which includes the company’s general
counsel, meets quarterly.
Marr was fishing for records of those meetings that he could subpoena for
his lawsuit.
“Certainly,” Marr asked Rust, “you keep records of the quarterly meetings
where the entire Chairman’s Council is present?”
“We have an agenda,” Rust said, “but minutes in that, no.”
“Why not?” Marr asked.
Rust replied, “Never felt a need to.”
Marr later asked, “Are there any written agendas that are available should I
choose to request them in the lawsuit?”
“I’m not sure what might be available,” Rust said.
Rust also said policyholders, who essentially own the private mutual
company, are not entitled to know what the Chairman’s Council discusses or
decides about litigation against State Farm, citing attorney-client
privilege.
Marr questioned why the company would withhold information from
policyholders, who own State Farm.
“Well, again,” said Rust (who has a law degree), “I’m not an expert in the
area, but I think as you find — even if I’m a shareholder in a publicly
traded company, there are things that are not — you know, I do not have
access to.”
Marr later asked if policyholders have a right to see documents from State
Farm’s investigation of Haag.
“No,” Rust said.
“Why not?” Marr asked. “Is it privileged?”
Rust said, “I believe so.”