AIG Filing Casts Doubt on ‘Limited Exposure’ Claim

By | February 1, 2010

  • February 1, 2010 at 10:44 am
    JDK says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Cassano and his former associates should be wearing stripes and behind bars. Its hard to believe he could make a claim that AIG was not over-leveraged.

  • February 1, 2010 at 12:50 pm
    Dimitri says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Agreed – Cassano should be eating lunch in a buffet line with a lot of guys in stripes and shackles.

    Phil Gramm of Texas made it possible with the Commodity Futures Regulation Act.

  • February 1, 2010 at 1:50 am
    Dale says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    As usual, those that took the risks made money when the taxpayers paid them 100%. Seems like Risk should mean Risk, and you take the loss along with the gain, if any.

  • February 2, 2010 at 8:57 am
    Batman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Holy disingenuousness, Robin; talk about double speak! I bothers me that all through out this article, reference is made to AIG writing “insurance” for CDOs, yet when they look closer, the company and others, went to a long way to make sure they weren’t selling insurance at all; that’s how this all stayed under the regulator’s radar. Instead, these were called “innovative investment vehicles”…yeah, and the emporor’s new clothes were nice too.

  • February 2, 2010 at 1:00 am
    anthony says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    With respect to any of these transactions did any Insurance company in the AIG Group obtain reinsurance? Were there any reinsurance recoveries & if so how much and who received the money?



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*