Medical Marijuana Insurance Specialist Offers Pot Raid Coverage

February 8, 2011

  • February 8, 2011 at 1:45 pm
    Realist says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Finally some sanity in our world!

  • February 8, 2011 at 1:50 pm
    Burnt says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Smokin’ Dude!

  • February 8, 2011 at 1:57 pm
    GL Guru says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    You would have to be high not to buy this coverage.

  • February 8, 2011 at 2:00 pm
    Jen says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Wow what a unique coverage. I have some clients that would definitely buy this. I wonder how it is priced…..

    • February 8, 2011 at 2:08 pm
      Mikey says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      It is priced very high.

  • February 8, 2011 at 2:11 pm
    Observer says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Could the underwriter be in California? He would have to be high to offer this coverage. I think people in California can get this stuff if they have a hangnail.

  • February 8, 2011 at 2:13 pm
    SFOInsuranceLady says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Now the medicinal marijuana clubs don’t have to worry about going up in smoke!

  • February 8, 2011 at 2:30 pm
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Note the huge exclusion if the place is raided by “federal authorities” like the DEA. Seems fairly worthless for any CA dispensary – if it’s getting raided in CA it’s by the feds.. unless something else is going on like selling cocaine which would then also exclude coverage for not complying with state and local laws.

  • February 8, 2011 at 2:32 pm
    xena says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    DAVE’S NOT HOME!

    • February 8, 2011 at 2:34 pm
      Burnt says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      You know, all the gen y’s, x’s & millenuims are not going to know what you are talking about.

      • February 8, 2011 at 4:48 pm
        M says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 0
        Thumb down 0

        Hey, I’m a Millennial and I totally got it! Wait… what does that say about me? :-)

  • February 8, 2011 at 2:33 pm
    Joseph Vincent Mama, III says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    they call it the “Buzz Kill Enhancement.” It provides for loss of business income after all the paranoid stoners freak out and stay away from your dispensary for a week after the raid, and provides enough extra to buy 45 pizzas to lure your customers back.

  • February 8, 2011 at 2:36 pm
    Owsley says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Probably offered by a well-known insurance company who’s former CEO is a known progressive and outspoken pot enthusiast.

    Weird Jimmy could use some of this to cover “Happy Herb’s Nice Dreams” ice cream coach.

  • February 8, 2011 at 2:48 pm
    Jen says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    @TheClaims Advocate – Ummmm when did it become okay to insure illegal acts? Just wondering? Marijuana is only legal on a state level, so if they were insuring federal raids it would provide coverage for an intentional illegal act.
    Where do you adjust claims at? I might have a few murderers and cocaine manufacturers that need good insurance coverage that I could send your way.
    I just spoke to the agency that is offering this coverage and it actually sounds pretty good. Just saying you might want to learn a bit more about the subject before you comment

    • February 8, 2011 at 3:00 pm
      Jen says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      P.S. The federal governement is not the entity performing raids. I have at least ten dispensaries in CA that have been raided by the State for one reason or another. All operating legally within city, state and county guidelines

  • February 8, 2011 at 3:10 pm
    Erik M. Olsen, CIC says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Does anyone have a copy of one of these contracts? I would love to see the language in the endorsements.

    • February 8, 2011 at 3:56 pm
      Mrs Dean Wormer says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      Yes, I’m wondering what, exactly, the definition of a “raid” is?

  • February 8, 2011 at 4:17 pm
    Tom says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Brought to you by Cheech and Chong LLC (let’s light canabis) agency. Only in America can “smoking” (hemp) be a good thing while the same jurors render verdicts against tobacco companies. One has to be stoned to miss the irony.

  • February 8, 2011 at 4:59 pm
    Stephen Tallinghasternathy says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Tom, cannabis doesn’t kill 430,000 people a year. Tobacco does.

    And Dave’s not home.

  • February 8, 2011 at 5:29 pm
    Bob says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Actually, it’s “Dave’s not here” not “Dave’s not home”.

    • February 9, 2011 at 1:18 pm
      xena says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      Sorry Bob. You are right! Dave’s not here is correct. I’ve not listened to my Cheech and Chong LPs in a long time. Perhaps it’s time to give them a spin again. And yes, I still have my turn-table and all my records, too. And pot should be legalized! The high doesn’t last as long as alcohol. And most pot-heads don’t smoke and drive anyway. What IS the big deal?

  • February 8, 2011 at 8:04 pm
    mark says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Wow, that is quite and endorsement! I wonder how much they will charge..

    • February 9, 2011 at 9:25 am
      Joker says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      …about $375/ounce :)

  • February 9, 2011 at 7:46 pm
    Stevo says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Ill take that bet for $40K in premium!! The raids are over… that was bush’s thing. But if they start raiding again…. 1000% loss ratio! Good luck underwriting that one!

  • February 9, 2011 at 11:44 pm
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    DEA is on hold for now. This does not stop local or state law enforcement from conducting raids, especially if some local pols are seeking good “get tough on crime” headlines. Raid coverage will help those unfairly harmed get their shops open quickly again.

  • February 10, 2011 at 3:34 pm
    paul says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I’m getting hungry thinking about the coverage.

  • February 14, 2011 at 10:30 am
    Al says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Who ever thought there’d be insurance for getting yer mellow harshed?!



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*