Consumer Rebates Under Medical Loss Ratio Estimated to Be $1.3 Billion

By | April 30, 2012

  • April 30, 2012 at 3:43 pm
    Agent says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    HMMMMMM! $127 Annual rebate on Healthcare costs. This sounds a lot like the tax refund I didn’t get. What a savings! And I didn’t think there was one positive to Obamacare. This should get me two tanks of gas.

  • April 30, 2012 at 3:45 pm
    Sally Anne Fannymaker says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    It may not be much to Agent, but I’ll take $127! Thank you, President Obama.

    • April 30, 2012 at 4:42 pm
      Agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      Sally Anne, You are as goofy as many of the other Progressive leaners. Do you have any idea what the MLR is or what it will do to the industry? Obviously, you haven’t studied this at all or read any part of Obamacare. All you want is your little rebate just like the rest of the gimmee, gimmee crowd. Do you think this will offset your rate increases that have been rampant on most Group and Individual policies? Wake up and smell the coffee.

  • April 30, 2012 at 4:54 pm
    Sally Anne Fannymaker says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    You should send me your $127.

    • April 30, 2012 at 5:37 pm
      Agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      I can’t because my Health Insurance Costs just went up again. I think it was because the carrier knows what is coming down the pike.

      • June 21, 2012 at 10:11 pm
        gerry says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 0
        Thumb down 0

        Sally does not get it. We are all paying more for health insurance. A lot more that 127 dollars a year. So the rebate is really meaningless. However, one should not expect an Obama sycophant to understand simple math or have the ability to use logic.

        • July 10, 2012 at 6:32 pm
          Paul says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 0
          Thumb down 0

          Again deliberately obtuse. A rebate is a rebate and it makes big-health clearly accountable for the gouging-profits they have made. Hint: when a corporation gives you $127 they can’t give it to the CEO – with me still?

          By the way – the fact that you are reading/posting replies means that you aren’t super-rich and you aren’t gonna be (newflash!!!!). Get with the program bub ACA is in the best interests of every single person who is not indepedendently wealthy. You’re just too much of a teabagger to realize.

          You want Romney for another 8 years of Bush financial destruction? How stupid can you BE and still breathe without help?

      • July 10, 2012 at 6:28 pm
        Paul says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 0
        Thumb down 0

        oh don’t be so disingenuous – they will STILL be subject to the loss-ratio by law. Besides, have you really not noticed that they have been hiking premiums big-time every year for the last 20. Suddenly now you want to blame someone other then big-health for these increases? Is anyone really this confused?

  • June 21, 2012 at 10:13 pm
    gerry says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    boo

  • July 10, 2012 at 4:14 pm
    Ruth says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    If the jperson getting the rebate was an employee for 1/2 yr and on COBRA paying by check for the 1/2 year how would the rebate be given?



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*