Supreme Court Rejects BP’s Bid for Review of Gulf Oil Settlement

By | December 8, 2014

  • March 27, 2016 at 2:04 pm
    JOHN R SHORES, CPA says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    BP IS STILL SHOWING CONTEMPT FOR THIS SUPREME COURT DECISION. I RECENTLY HAD A CLIENT FILE A CLAIM THROUGH AND ATTORNEY IN JANUARY,2015 AND WAS PAID IN DECEMBER, 2015.

    MY CLAIM WAS FILED IN MAY,2013 AND THE STATUS WAS “ACCOUNTANT REVIEW:
    AWAITING ASSIGNMENT TO ACCOUNTANT”. THIS STATUS APPEARED UNTIL FEBRUARY 17,2016 WHEN I WAS ASSIGNED AN ACCOUNTANT WHO E-MAIL A BUNCH OF QUESTIONS THAT WERE CLEARLY ANSWERED IN MY CLAIM DOCUMENTS.
    SINCE I HELPED OVER A DOZEN CLIENTS FILE CLAIMED I HAVE ENCOUNTERED THIS STALL TACTIC BEFORE WHEN I ASKED WHEN SHE WOULD FINISH THE ACCOUNTANT REVIEW, I GOT A RUN AROUND AND NO STRAIGHT ANSWER.

    I GUESS I WILL HAVE TO WAIT ANOTHER 2 1/2 YEARS WHILE MY CLAIM IS IN ACCOUNTANT REVIEW AND ANOTHER 2 1/2 YEARS IN QUALITY REVIEW.
    MY PRACTICE HAS HAD LESS THAN $55,000/YR IN SALES FOR THE CLAIM AND BASE PERIODS BUT APPARENTLY IT IS TO COMPLEX FOR THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR.

    IF THIS IS NOT CONTEMPT OF COURT I DO NOT KNOW WHAT IS.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*