Beazley Introduces Fraudulent Instruction Insurance

Beazley has introduced fraudulent instruction insurance, a new coverage to address losses from the transfer of funds as a result of fraudulent instructions from a person purporting to be a vendor, client or authorized employee. The new endorsement, which has a limit of up to $250,000, will be for Beazley clients who currently carry its commercial crime policy.

“Fraudulent instruction scams are so sophisticated that basically any business that transfers funds is vulnerable,” said Bill Jennings who heads the financial fidelity/commercial crime unit for Beazley in New York. “Fraudsters rely on human error-a person not noticing that one character is wrong in an email. They rely on a subordinate’s eagerness to please and be responsive to a superior. These and other factors create scenarios for lost funds that are impossible to get back, especially if they leave the United States.”

Beazley’s claims team cites the following actual incidents which have occurred in recent months:

According to an Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) June 2014 “Scam Report,” the average amount lost in frauds such as the examples above is $55,000. However, there has been one report of $800,000 lost. The businesses victimized, according to IC3, are usually located in the United States, England and Canada. The scam involves names, telephone numbers, IP addresses and bank accounts that can be linked back to traditional Nigerian scams with the actual destination of the funds most often being institutions in China and Hong Kong. Other countries known to receive fraudulent fund transfers include South Africa, Turkey and Japan.

“Simply put, the Nigerian prince scam aimed at consumers is now flourishing in the business-to-business world,” said Jennings. “In fact, while the funds are usually wired to China, many of these false instructions to wire funds can be traced back to Nigeria.”

Jennings concluded that businesses should bear in mind that traditional computer fraud insurance may not cover an incident where an employee transfers funds voluntarily even if it is the result of fraud.