Driverless Cars Give Lawyers Bottomless List of Defendants

By and | December 22, 2015

  • December 22, 2015 at 12:29 pm
    vox sanitus says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 20
    Thumb down 1

    Deep pockets? Yes. Fertile ground? Not so fast Mr. Injury Lawyer.
    With few or no at-fault accidents the driverless cars’ makers, programmers, designers, etc… ad nauseum are not good targets. As of now, there’s not a single at fault accident. I’d like to say that Mr. Injury Lawyer is in trouble, but he’s not. He owns a debauched judiciary in most states. Injuries keep going down, payments keep going up.

    • December 22, 2015 at 2:16 pm
      Agent says:
      Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 20
      Thumb down 3

      Who gets sued if a determined hacker makes a driverless car go haywire and run over another motorist or cause a big chain reaction accident?

      • December 22, 2015 at 2:47 pm
        Rosenblatt says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 9
        Thumb down 10

        First, obviously the hacker would get sued if they were a known identity. Second, if the manufacturer knew of a vulnerability in their software and did not patch it, the AI manufacturer could be found liable.

        • January 10, 2016 at 3:40 pm
          Dave says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 2
          Thumb down 0

          You mean like all the criminals in other crimes get sued? The gang bangers who commit gun crimes? The rioters who destroyed so much property in the Baltimore and Ferguson protests (riots)? Yeah, right!

  • December 22, 2015 at 2:37 pm
    Jack Kanauph says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 18
    Thumb down 0

    Sounds like we won’t need to buy insurance anymore. We’ll just blame and sue all the manufacturers at accident time.

    • December 22, 2015 at 2:45 pm
      Agent says:
      Hot debate. What do you think?
      Thumb up 15
      Thumb down 14

      Jack, there isn’t enough money in the world to settle all the claims in this sue happy society. The ignition switch issue with Government Motors is a mere drop in the bucket. Lawyers will be in euphoria. Erin Brockovich will have a field day.

      • December 22, 2015 at 2:49 pm
        confused says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 4
        Thumb down 9

        unless there is an asbestos issue, Erin Brockovich (who isn’t even an attorney!) wouldn’t be involved in the case. facts matter

        • December 22, 2015 at 3:36 pm
          Old Lawyer says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 9
          Thumb down 3

          Erin Brockovich was not involved in an asbestos case; it was a case against PG&E involving contaminated ground water supplies. FACTS MATTER. I know the lawyer who settled that PG&E suit,and he’ll jump on this there is money to be made.

          • December 22, 2015 at 3:45 pm
            Agent says:
            Hot debate. What do you think?
            Thumb up 12
            Thumb down 14

            Perhaps Erin will realize this is a much richer field to get some good class actions going on and switch from the ground water contaminations suits. She can go around to every one who may have been harmed, have some class action meetings and who knows where it might lead.

            Facts Matter!

          • December 23, 2015 at 9:13 am
            confused says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 2
            Thumb down 7

            I agree the famous case they made a movie about was PG&E. However, currently, “she…works as a consultant for the New York law firm of Weitz & Luxenberg, which has a focus on personal injury claims for asbestos exposure”

      • December 29, 2015 at 10:57 pm
        UW says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 1
        Thumb down 2

        You are an absolute ….. idiot. Your prime example of too many claims is a case where a company dumped poison into the drinking water and gave hundreds of people cancer?

        You are so uneducated, and so misinformed on every single topic I have ever seen you comment on that it is absolutely astounding you can function day-to-day. You are just pure, absolute, 100% garbage.

  • December 22, 2015 at 2:37 pm
    Texas Agent says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 17
    Thumb down 0

    I have NEVER had any electronic device that I haven’t had to turn off then turn back on (Ctrl/Alt/Delete). So when (not if) this happens and your doing 75mph what then?????????????

    • December 22, 2015 at 3:48 pm
      Agent says:
      Hot debate. What do you think?
      Thumb up 12
      Thumb down 9

      Hey Texas, cars have so much electronics on them now, the technician automatically hooks up to the computer to see what it tells them. Some car manufacturers have already been hacked, like Chrysler Jeep and they come in through the radio system to get in. This has led to recalls and they have to put another chip in it. I am waiting for GM ON Star to get hacked and cause big problems.

  • December 22, 2015 at 2:39 pm
    Dave says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 25
    Thumb down 1

    The fact that the plaintiff’s bar is salivating over this disgusts me. It points out how flawed and corrupt our current system is. If ambulance chasers were human beings they would be celebrating the fact that overall this should lead to less accidents and be satisfied if makes means less business for them as it improves the human condition. But they are not human being, but blood sucking lawyers believing they can never make enough money.

    What do you call 1,000 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?

    A good start!

    • December 22, 2015 at 3:01 pm
      May not be the system, Dave says:
      Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 10
      Thumb down 0

      It may be the lawyers taking advantage of the system.

      • December 22, 2015 at 4:48 pm
        Dave says:
        Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 11
        Thumb down 1

        Of course lawyers take advantage of the system. The system needs to change!

        • December 22, 2015 at 5:54 pm
          Agent says:
          Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 13
          Thumb down 3

          Dave, I think we have a bunch of lawyers in charge currently in Congress and the White House. Until a whole lot of non lawyers are elected, there is no chance.

          • December 29, 2015 at 10:58 pm
            UW says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 1
            Thumb down 2

            Yeah, it is sooooo dumb to have lawyers write laws.

  • December 22, 2015 at 4:41 pm
    JB says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 25
    Thumb down 0

    If we’re going to have driverless cars, then we should also have lawyerless plaintiffs.

    • December 22, 2015 at 4:48 pm
      Dave says:
      Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 14
      Thumb down 0

      Great comment

    • December 22, 2015 at 7:16 pm
      BooYah says:
      Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 13
      Thumb down 0

      Best comment yet, JB!

    • December 29, 2015 at 11:00 pm
      UW says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 1
      Thumb down 3

      So, Google screws up, and their car rams you when you are a pedestrian, but in your perfect world, there aren’t lawyers for the struck plaintiff, so Google has to pay $0, and in fact probably charges the injured person for damaging their car.

      • January 10, 2016 at 3:42 pm
        Dave says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 2
        Thumb down 1

        Really?

  • December 22, 2015 at 11:07 pm
    lyle says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 4
    Thumb down 0

    I think the example of aviation works well here even if the plane is on autopilot, the pilot is responsible, all be it if there is a defect the company that made the part is also responsible. This is why I think Ca is right, since there is a nice precedent. (I was thinking here of general aviation more than commercial, general aviation planes can have fairly complex autopilots)

  • January 9, 2016 at 11:59 am
    Howard E says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 1
    Thumb down 0

    ““If you have to be hit by a car, then you should hope that you’re hit by an automated car because you will likely have recourse to a company or companies with far deeper pockets than your average driver, vehicle owner or insurance policy,” Smith said”
    Your grandchildren might still be alive by the time your lawsuit makes it thru the courts and appeals.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*