Wait – I’m confused. The article said “Buffett said it was “highly likely” that climate change posed a “major problem for the planet.” How does that mean he denies climate change is happening?
It could be the part where he doesn’t expect to pay out substantial dollars on claims due to climate change.
This is double speak. He wants the image of supporting climate change, but he knows it poses little catastrophic danger. As evident by him saying he doesn’t expect claims paid out on it.
W sees the world through green glasses. W is trying to reassure his insurance shareholders not to panic. When claims come to pay for floods and catastrophes, W will find a way to cap the amount paid and increase insurance premiums. W has a tattoo on his large ass that says: Whoever Has the Gold Makes the Rules.
W is old and dumb. The new rule is: “be kind to others, take care of Mother Earth and the people that need help.” The fossil fuels W owns will soon be worthless, just like coal.
Fresh water, clean air, healthy veggies will rule the world.
And you claim you have a Doctorate? Uncle Warren is making plenty of money hauling oil on his trains after he got Obama to nix the pipeline. By the way, we have more oil than the middle east and fossil fuels are going no where for the foreseeable future. There is not much future in algae or cow dung to help the energy needs. Also, the Democrats caused the problems in the Flint, Mi water scandal.
I actually believe Climate change is an issue, and how we treat the environment is a big deal, one of the biggest in the world.
Which is exactly why I don’t want the government touching it.
I also don’t weigh it as the same problems most do.
Oil in the sea, it’s an immediate problem. Oil seepage in pipes, immediate problem. Dangerous material leaks, garbage, etc, problem.
Do I think we will over heat the Earth? Hell to the no.
Will we cause some shifts? Yes. We will have to adjust. So it’s a big deal, third world countries would be harmed the most by the changing weather patterns.
However, there is a reason they dropped the words “global warming” an went with Climate change. The reason is that habitats will change. It could be bad for a lot of nations that will suddenly have a lush area turn barren. Moving locations for them and taking resources where needed is more difficult.
This is an issue that should be taken seriously.
Not to the degree democrats mislead on it,
And not by having carbon credits, or giving money to your buddies,
Bob, the third world countries and China & India are causing most of the pollution, emission problems. China made a great deal with Obama when they agreed to only start curbing their emissions in 2030 after he promised to cut 25% by 2020. Everybody wants clean air, water, should recycle etc. Our cars are far better on emissions than they were 10 years ago. Until we get other countries to do something serious, the US cannot make an impact to any degree.
I know we can make changes here, and we do output a fair amount. less than China, but it can be lower.
I agree, we all want clean air water and to recycle. The main reason I’m shifting the focus on how I say this is that most people think you don’t want all those things, because of how you talk they judge your motives.
This is what I mean about democrats not making things better. They make bad deals. Obama isn’t helping the issue.
I don’t think republicans or democrats are better or worse on this one. I think people should spread awareness.
OMG. Warren Buffet is a climate change denier! Good for him.
Why is he supporting the President and Hilliary then?
Wait – I’m confused. The article said “Buffett said it was “highly likely” that climate change posed a “major problem for the planet.” How does that mean he denies climate change is happening?
It could be the part where he doesn’t expect to pay out substantial dollars on claims due to climate change.
This is double speak. He wants the image of supporting climate change, but he knows it poses little catastrophic danger. As evident by him saying he doesn’t expect claims paid out on it.
Dear Confused,
W sees the world through green glasses. W is trying to reassure his insurance shareholders not to panic. When claims come to pay for floods and catastrophes, W will find a way to cap the amount paid and increase insurance premiums. W has a tattoo on his large ass that says: Whoever Has the Gold Makes the Rules.
W is old and dumb. The new rule is: “be kind to others, take care of Mother Earth and the people that need help.” The fossil fuels W owns will soon be worthless, just like coal.
Fresh water, clean air, healthy veggies will rule the world.
And you claim you have a Doctorate? Uncle Warren is making plenty of money hauling oil on his trains after he got Obama to nix the pipeline. By the way, we have more oil than the middle east and fossil fuels are going no where for the foreseeable future. There is not much future in algae or cow dung to help the energy needs. Also, the Democrats caused the problems in the Flint, Mi water scandal.
Climate Change is the most serious national security threat that we face as a nation. BHO
I actually believe Climate change is an issue, and how we treat the environment is a big deal, one of the biggest in the world.
Which is exactly why I don’t want the government touching it.
I also don’t weigh it as the same problems most do.
Oil in the sea, it’s an immediate problem. Oil seepage in pipes, immediate problem. Dangerous material leaks, garbage, etc, problem.
Do I think we will over heat the Earth? Hell to the no.
Will we cause some shifts? Yes. We will have to adjust. So it’s a big deal, third world countries would be harmed the most by the changing weather patterns.
However, there is a reason they dropped the words “global warming” an went with Climate change. The reason is that habitats will change. It could be bad for a lot of nations that will suddenly have a lush area turn barren. Moving locations for them and taking resources where needed is more difficult.
This is an issue that should be taken seriously.
Not to the degree democrats mislead on it,
And not by having carbon credits, or giving money to your buddies,
But by spreading concerns to the people.
Bob, the third world countries and China & India are causing most of the pollution, emission problems. China made a great deal with Obama when they agreed to only start curbing their emissions in 2030 after he promised to cut 25% by 2020. Everybody wants clean air, water, should recycle etc. Our cars are far better on emissions than they were 10 years ago. Until we get other countries to do something serious, the US cannot make an impact to any degree.
I know we can make changes here, and we do output a fair amount. less than China, but it can be lower.
I agree, we all want clean air water and to recycle. The main reason I’m shifting the focus on how I say this is that most people think you don’t want all those things, because of how you talk they judge your motives.
This is what I mean about democrats not making things better. They make bad deals. Obama isn’t helping the issue.
I don’t think republicans or democrats are better or worse on this one. I think people should spread awareness.
Bob, there is so much disinformation out there and not much common sense. Hypocrisy is the Democrats middle name.