Report: Trump Administration Orders Removal of Climate Page from EPA’s Website

By | January 25, 2017

  • January 25, 2017 at 10:30 am
    SacFlood says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 50
    Thumb down 22

    I would hope that someone at the EPA would contact the folks at http://www.archive.org to help us preserve the data contained on those webpages.

    • January 25, 2017 at 5:29 pm
      AZ Ins Man says:
      Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 15
      Thumb down 30

      Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  • January 25, 2017 at 12:30 pm
    Twitler says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 30
    Thumb down 20

    If the science does not support your beliefs get rid of science. Conservatives should be ashamed for supporting this authoritarian.

    • January 26, 2017 at 11:44 am
      Agent says:
      Hot debate. What do you think?
      Thumb up 18
      Thumb down 26

      Conservatives were ashamed of the leftist former President who said Climate Change was the most serious national security threat that the nation faced. They are proud of the new President who is doing so much good now and recovering the nation from the extremely poor choices of Progressive Liberals.

    • January 29, 2017 at 6:21 pm
      Jax Agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 2
      Thumb down 1

      If the science is wrong, only a liberal dimwit would go down fighting to support it. The ‘science’, as it were, is nowhere near being in depth enough to determine it’s validity. Obozo and the likes of you, twitler, should be ashamed of trying to shove false science down the American people’s throats.
      Good news for you, cupcake, there’s a new Sheriff in town !!!

  • January 25, 2017 at 1:40 pm
    Celtica says:
    Hot debate. What do you think?
    Thumb up 32
    Thumb down 31

    Well, isn’t that a well know solution for ending climate change — just stick your head in the tar sands…

    • January 26, 2017 at 8:16 am
      TrumPolarBear says:
      Hot debate. What do you think?
      Thumb up 11
      Thumb down 13

      Climate change CANNOT be ‘ended’. It is almost completely out of the control of humans. Why can’t you get that through your head?

      • January 26, 2017 at 11:24 am
        Twitler says:
        Hot debate. What do you think?
        Thumb up 13
        Thumb down 9

        Currently climate change is almost entirely due to man, and we could potentially be in a cooling cycle otherwise according to 97% of all climate scientists.

        • January 29, 2017 at 6:23 pm
          Jax Agent says:
          Hot debate. What do you think?
          Thumb up 11
          Thumb down 11

          Due to man……..wow, are you stupid or what ……97% of scientists that wanted to keep their jobs said exactly what they were told to say……..that is coming to an end.

      • January 26, 2017 at 2:38 pm
        Celtica says:
        Hot debate. What do you think?
        Thumb up 20
        Thumb down 13

        Of course, climate change cannot be ended — no one ever said it could. But we can control our exposure to it. I know that is beyond your comprehension — so don’t feel the need to embarrass yourself further.

  • January 25, 2017 at 1:42 pm
    blu lightning says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 48
    Thumb down 32

    Gore made this into a political issue in part due to his own path to earning a ton of money on this after he lost in 2000 and in part a way to stay somehow relevant. Gore kind of ruined it for a reasonable and objective conversation on the topic.
    Its still a political issue to this day.
    First of all the science isn’t there in a way where the average person would agree. Instead we get bits of information like 98% of all climate scientists agree with man made global warming or 88% of all ice sheets are melted. Or the best was from the Paris Climate change meeting where the big message from the experts there was that its probably too lagte but lets do it anyway.
    In all honesty it isn’t a compelling case.
    As someone who was raised in a learning environment that taught you to be skeptical yet open minded I’ve always felt that the Gore climate change movement was and is sadly lacking in a fact based comprehensive case but rather has relied on scare tactics. Which as both sides would agree hasn’t led to a solution or even consensus on what if anything is going on.
    I’m all in favor of returning this to the pure realm of science-let them figure it out without political pressure from anyone left or right. Then we can move ahead together.

    • January 25, 2017 at 2:00 pm
      Don't Call Me Shirley says:
      Hot debate. What do you think?
      Thumb up 17
      Thumb down 12

      98% isn’t a compelling case?

      • January 26, 2017 at 11:07 am
        integrity matters says:
        Hot debate. What do you think?
        Thumb up 15
        Thumb down 15

        Not if the same 98% of the scientists are reading and believing the false and non-credible data.

        I guess if 98% of the Germans thought Hitler was a good leader, we should have agreed with them.

        • January 26, 2017 at 11:27 am
          Twitler says:
          Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 20
          Thumb down 10

          This is based on peer reviewed research with data from thousands of different sources.

          Fascists cannot cite Hitler when they are in another thread arguing that pictures and videos aren’t evidence of crowd size solely because Trump says so. Also, Birthers like you are not credible on any topic.

          • January 26, 2017 at 11:46 am
            Agent says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 7
            Thumb down 10

            David Muir saw several pictures last night of the massive crowd size and he had nothing to refute it.

          • January 26, 2017 at 12:30 pm
            Confused says:
            Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 17
            Thumb down 7

            Classic Agent mis-information post. Let’s rewind the tape and look at the transcript:

            “And I will say this…very large crowd of people …and they say the press doesn’t cover them,” Trump added

            “I don’t want to compare crowd sizes again,” Muir interjected.

            Muir didn’t TRY to refute it, he TRIED to move on to more important topics because Trump was beating a dead horse that Muir had already discussed many times.

          • January 26, 2017 at 2:41 pm
            Celtica says:
            Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 21
            Thumb down 6

            David Muir had other MORE IMPORTANT things to discuss with Trump other than Trump’s obsession with Trump and Trump’s less than stellar ratings. PS: Hillary won the popular vote. That is clearly under Trump’s skin and will remain so. Some gifts just keep on giving.

          • January 26, 2017 at 4:40 pm
            Patticake says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 2
            Thumb down 4

            Confused–YOU are confused…the crowd that Mr. Trump was referring to in that interview was the large crowd that is expected tomorrow from pro-life groups. THOSE are the crowds that the press doesn’t cover. Perhaps you and Muir need to clean the wax out of your ears.

          • January 26, 2017 at 4:53 pm
            Confused says:
          • January 26, 2017 at 5:23 pm
            Twitler says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 9
            Thumb down 4

            He showed a picture of the very front, which was full, not of the area for non-billionaires, VIPs and bribers. Also, the picture is dated for the day of the Women’s March, not the inauguration, just in case you think for even a second they are competent in any way. This is not up for debate, if you argue against it you are not credible on any topic.

            Patti, why would he be showing as proof a picture of a crowd for an event that hasn’t happened yet, dated a week ago? It makes absolutely no sense, but explains why many people voted for Trump.

          • January 28, 2017 at 4:12 pm
            Captain Planet says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 4
            Thumb down 3

            Twitler,
            Whereas it may explain why many voted for him, it also explains why many more did not!

    • January 26, 2017 at 10:12 am
      Little Frog says:
      Hot debate. What do you think?
      Thumb up 11
      Thumb down 11

      A rational, detailed statement; thank you.
      Adding to my skepticism is the apparent denial, or at least diminishment, of the contribution of volcanic eruptions (Mt.Pinitubo), Solar activity, and pollution from Eastern Europe & Asia (especially China), on a dynamic climatic system which has been in constant change for billions of years.
      To the point of the 98?% of climate scientists in concurrence; What percent of them are totally dependent on government funding and agendas for themselves and their colleagues? I remember hearing lots of healthy skepticism when the tobacco funded researchers (scientists) told us that tobacco was a natural product, no more dangerous than anything else in our normal lives.

      • January 26, 2017 at 11:48 am
        Agent says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 4
        Thumb down 8

        Some say Marijuana is harmless and we shouldn’t be concerned that it destroys brain cells and leads to more harmful drugs.

        • January 26, 2017 at 12:44 pm
          Conserving the Truth says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 7
          Thumb down 3

          Agent,

          Are you being serious?

      • January 26, 2017 at 12:36 pm
        Agent says:
        Hot debate. What do you think?
        Thumb up 10
        Thumb down 12

        Confused, classic sore loser buzzfeed post as usual. The reason Muir wanted to move on after viewing several pictures of the crowd size from several angles is that he was embarrassed. By the end of the interview, his face was totally flushed because he couldn’t make any headway with a President who was twice as smart as he was.

        • January 26, 2017 at 1:26 pm
          Captain Planet says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 11
          Thumb down 6

          You must have had rose-colored glasses on, his face was not flushed. But, you could certainly see rage building inside that incest-curious mind of the narcissist. He can’t let it go. And, the only thing smart about that Orange of The Oval is his phone. Did you see he had to delete his first tweet as Prez because he spelled honored, “honered”? So dang funny. This guy is going to be Presidential comedy gold!

          • January 30, 2017 at 8:57 am
            Captain Planet says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 7
            Thumb down 3

            censorship

            You must have had rose-colored glasses on, his face was not flushed. But, you could certainly see rage building inside that incest-curious mind of the narcissist. He can’t let it go. And, the only thing smart about that Orange of The Oval is his phone. Did you see he had to delete his first tweet as Prez because he spelled honored, “honered”? So dang funny. This guy is going to be Presidential comedy gold!

        • January 26, 2017 at 1:55 pm
          Confused says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 5
          Thumb down 3

          Literal transcripts are considered “buzzfeed posts” by Agent. ’nuff said

        • January 26, 2017 at 2:44 pm
          Celtica says:
          Hot debate. What do you think?
          Thumb up 15
          Thumb down 6

          Well, if Trump is twice as smart as Muir, Trump just be TEN times smarter than you. Clearly, you are easily duped. If Trump told you he was a Nigerian prince who needed money to build a wall and you would get a return on your investment, you’d sent it to them (credit where credit is due — this was a late night TV joke).

      • January 26, 2017 at 2:08 pm
        2cents says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 6
        Thumb down 5

        Agreed, most of the research being conducted is fully funded by some company or organization that has a stake in the findings. You will very rarely find totally unbiased scientific findings. Conducting research requires such a large amount of funds that it becomes nearly impossible to do it without influence from some corporation.

        • January 26, 2017 at 3:52 pm
          2cents says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 4
          Thumb down 2

          And for what it’s worth, I did not vote for Trump…and I am married to a research Chemist.

          • January 27, 2017 at 1:09 pm
            Agent says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 3
            Thumb down 3

            For the record, you voted for the wrong person for POTUS.

          • January 28, 2017 at 10:44 pm
            Captain Planet says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 9
            Thumb down 1

            I’m so old, I remember American citizens have the freedom to vote for whomever they choose, there is no right or wrong.

  • January 25, 2017 at 1:50 pm
    Bryan Parker says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 3
    Thumb down 8

    Please have a look at this site for further information on climate change. I would welcome a rational discussion on this topic.
    http://www.junkscience.co.uk/2017/01/junk-science-number-99-the-global-warming-and-climate-change-hoax/

  • January 25, 2017 at 1:55 pm
    Perplexed says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 12
    Thumb down 3

    Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha…I can’t stop laughing!

    • January 25, 2017 at 2:17 pm
      Agent says:
      Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 14
      Thumb down 30

      Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    • January 25, 2017 at 3:15 pm
      Richard DaSilva says:
      Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 29
      Thumb down 17

      I wonder if you will still be laughing when the earthquakes caused by Fracking-backfill operations continue to worsen. And streets flood in daylight daytime conditions; the seas continue to rise; flooding increases on our costal lands-especially Florida’s coast, air quality again becomes an issue of breath. Over regulation; perhaps in some cases but GARBAGE, only for your kind of believer what I call the “Trump is truth” sycophants. The rest of us still think for ourselves. Laugh that off on your butt.

      • January 25, 2017 at 3:48 pm
        Agent says:
        Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 11
        Thumb down 24

        Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

        • February 2, 2017 at 1:14 pm
          Michael says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 0
          Thumb down 0

          Hey, look! Agent has a new phrase – buzzfeed news! Let the overuse begin!

      • January 25, 2017 at 3:56 pm
        TrumPolarBear says:
        Hot debate. What do you think?
        Thumb up 12
        Thumb down 17

        @Richard DaSilva;

        Where will the EQs occur? Please call the cops to warn them, ASAP!

        Let us know what they tell you to do.

        Let us know when Al Gore sells his (near) beachfront property and high-carbon output private jet. Ok? Thanks!

        I’m sure I’ll be lonnnnnnnng gone by the time Mother Nature warms the Earth enough to raise water levels. And, nothing Mankind does will prevent it. NOTHING.

        • January 25, 2017 at 4:12 pm
          Celtica says:
          Hot debate. What do you think?
          Thumb up 17
          Thumb down 9

          Oklahoma, you twit. Try and keep up with the news.

          • January 26, 2017 at 8:20 am
            TrumPolarBear says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 3
            Thumb down 11

            Gore owns property in Oklahoma, too? That’s not in as great jeopardy as his near beachfront property.

          • January 27, 2017 at 10:00 am
            Patticake says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 3
            Thumb down 2

            Keep up with the news…That is a good one, Celtica! I prefer REAL news…not FAKE news like what your liberal fake-news ‘sources’.

      • January 25, 2017 at 5:27 pm
        AZ Ins Man says:
        Hot debate. What do you think?
        Thumb up 17
        Thumb down 20

        Oh Horse Crap!!!
        You liberals were screaming the sky was also falling in the 80’s when the next ice age was fast approaching if we did not stop using aerosol cans or whatever???
        Al Gore wants everyone to reduce carbon output while flying private, living in a home costing $27,000 annually for utilities alone and riding in limosines everywhere.

        It would be more realistic to believe these alleged looming disasters if the left was not so hypocritical in everything they say and do.

        Climate will change as it has ALWAYS done and scientists can argue either way that humans will not change climate regardless of what we do.
        Not to mention, China is not acting green in any manner so does it make ANY difference what the U.S. does???

        DRILL BABY DRILL!!! If California falls into the ocean, oh well…

        • January 26, 2017 at 11:36 am
          Twitler says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 5
          Thumb down 4

          No, some stupid magazines said there was a potential ice age, the vast majority of scientists disagreed. This is right wing BS pushed by and for uninformed people.

          https://skepticalscience.com/ice-age-predictions-in-1970s-intermediate.htm

          scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2013/06/04/the-1970s-ice-age-myth-and-time-magazine-covers-by-david-kirtley/

    • January 26, 2017 at 8:19 am
      TrumPolarBear says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 2
      Thumb down 10

      Re-Posted on behalf of Agent:

      Agent said:

      Perplexed, me too! Now, he needs to fire at least the top 500 in the EPA for putting forth their garbage the last 8 years. I think the goal is to eliminate at least 75% of the worst regulations. These Progressives didn’t know what hit them.

      • January 26, 2017 at 12:47 pm
        Conserving the Truth says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 10
        Thumb down 5

        You have no idea the damage you are contributing to. You scare me. You really do. You will respond with more hatred. You have a terrifying mind. I hope you are well but truly I don’t believe you are. God forgive your intolerance, hatred and greed. God forgive you.

        • January 27, 2017 at 4:08 pm
          Agent says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 6
          Thumb down 8

          Conserving the Lie, we were scared the last 8 years of the damage Progressive Socialists were doing to this country. Thank God this country got the reprieve from their terrible policies and the former President is history now. Watching him leave in that chopper was a beautiful sight.

          • January 31, 2017 at 2:39 pm
            Don't Call Me Shirley says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 2

            Those Progressive Socialists got us out of the worst recession since the Great Depression.

    • January 27, 2017 at 5:19 pm
      Agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 3
      Thumb down 2

      Ha, ha, ha, ha. The libs on this site have obviously not read the other article about solar flares and how they can impact earth. They still believe man is causing climate change/Global Warming after being indoctrinated by Gore. Wonder how many people are seeing his second edition and how many theatres have cut it off already.

  • January 25, 2017 at 1:58 pm
    Don't Call Me Shirley says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 7
    Thumb down 5

    Fahrenheit 2017. It’s beginning…

    • January 26, 2017 at 8:21 am
      TrumPolarBear says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 2
      Thumb down 11

      Fair & Balanced Govt 2017. It’s happening.

      • January 26, 2017 at 5:44 pm
        Celtica says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 9
        Thumb down 4

        Fair and Balance Government — so you admit Fox news is running the government.

    • January 26, 2017 at 2:45 pm
      Celtica says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 8
      Thumb down 2

      So is 1984…

      • January 26, 2017 at 5:28 pm
        Twitler says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 4
        Thumb down 1

        And most accurately, IMO, Brave New World and It Can’t Happen Here.

        • January 28, 2017 at 12:56 pm
          Captain Planet says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 0
          Thumb down 2

          “Idiocracy”

      • January 29, 2017 at 6:32 pm
        Jax Agent says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 2
        Thumb down 1

        1984 just ended !!

        • January 30, 2017 at 2:38 pm
          Agent says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 4
          Thumb down 2

          Jax, we had a real Ministry of Information under Obama for 8 long years. Actually, it was misinformation for a political agenda. Thank goodness, the people saw through all of that in November. The sore loser media is going crazy now.

      • January 30, 2017 at 8:58 am
        Captain Planet says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 1
        Thumb down 1

        censorship

        “Idiocracy”

  • January 25, 2017 at 2:01 pm
    PM says:
    Hot debate. What do you think?
    Thumb up 26
    Thumb down 25

    Bias is amazing to state appear to tighten control and remove dissenting discussions. I would prefer they put factual data on the website and discuss the real impacts of global weather over the past 50 years. The same bafoons that started global cooling scare and ice age fears in the late 1960s and early 1970s, started global warming in late 1970s cause it fit. This is a fear tactic by global leaders and want-a-be like Al Gore to take over. Nothing more and nothing less. Now its called climate change caused today was not the same as yesterday. We need to leave this world a better place than we found it, however we don’t need to become a third world country to get there. The third world countries need to take the steps to limit their pollution. Trump may not be the best president, but at least we will act like a constitutional republic before he leaves office. At the rate he’s going, that may occur next week.

    • January 25, 2017 at 5:38 pm
      AZ Ins Man says:
      Hot debate. What do you think?
      Thumb up 12
      Thumb down 15

      Trump, in 2-3 days has done what NO politician has EVER done. He HAS DONE WHAT HE PROMISED TO DO – EXACTLY SO FAR!!
      We have a chance to finally repair the damage done by entrenched 40 year politicians who have not had a new idea in 39 years. We should enact term limits. TWO terms maximum, just like the President. We would NOT have this debt situation if we had those limits.
      The younger generation does NOT want to pay bills that we have nothing to show for them?? Airports are 3rd world, highways in CA have potholes are large the the 1962 VW Bugs driving around over there.
      Our government has SPENT our Social Security monies and continues to do so.
      If the House, Senate and President were on OUR HEALTH PLAN and OUR RETIREMENT PLAN, it would be FIXED by now.
      But, the “elite class” has setup their own nice deals and paid themselves handsomely with taxpayer dollars. Trump is one of the only politicians that is not elected because he wants to become a millionaire. He already has money. Same with his cabinet. They are likely the only group that can repair this damage because they are not constantly scamming money finding loopholes in the laws they wrote…

      The liberals can protest until the 8 years are expired. I like watching it on TV. It is changing NOTHING. It is now time to pay the piper and swallow this debt we ran up for nothing. both liberals and repubs have run up this debt.
      Obama’s legacy??? NOt anything I would want.

      • January 25, 2017 at 6:30 pm
        Celtica says:
        Hot debate. What do you think?
        Thumb up 11
        Thumb down 10

        Yeah, that Putin does good work.

        • January 26, 2017 at 8:25 am
          TrumPolarBear says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 6
          Thumb down 11

          Hacking ruse by Hacking Russians is another example of Libitterals inability to put forth a logical argument.

          Why would the Socialists / Communists in Russia want to see the Socialist / Communists running for POTUS in the USA defeated by Conservatives / Populists who would treat them (Russians) much more harshly?

          Please reply with a sensible answer, or don’t bother replying at all.

          • January 26, 2017 at 2:46 pm
            Celtica says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 9
            Thumb down 5

            You need to take your own advice about posting sensible answers.

          • January 27, 2017 at 4:12 pm
            Agent says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 2
            Thumb down 2

            TrumPolar, it was sure nice to see our new President having a joint press conference with the new female Prime Minister of GB. She talks a lot like Margaret Thatcher which is a good thing. They took a picture in front of the Churchill bust only recently returned to the Oval Office.

            Trolls, they didn’t take the Martin Luther King bust out in case you were wondering. There is room for both in the office. I also like the Reagan rug. Class has returned to the Oval Office.

          • January 28, 2017 at 4:28 pm
            Captain Planet says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 1

            You are right about one thing, Agent. Class has returned to The Oval Office. Kindergarten, to be exact.

          • January 30, 2017 at 8:58 am
            Captain Planet says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 7
            Thumb down 4

            censorship

            You are right about one thing, Agent. Class has returned to The Oval Office. Kindergarten, to be exact.

      • January 26, 2017 at 11:39 am
        Twitler says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 8
        Thumb down 2

        Trump’s repeal of Obamacare and wall both increase the deficit. Conservatives don’t care about the debt, they care about not paying taxes and harming the poor, disadvantaged, and minorities.

      • January 26, 2017 at 1:17 pm
        Captain Planet says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 5
        Thumb down 2

        AZ Ins Man wrote, “Trump, in 2-3 days has done what NO politician has EVER done.”

        Don’t stop there, he’s done what no man has ever done before when he was simultaneously rejected by millions of women worldwide. World record for most female rejections received by any individual. That will never be outdone. OUCH!

        When do we invade Poland?

        • January 30, 2017 at 8:59 am
          Captain Planet says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 2
          Thumb down 3

          censorship

          AZ Ins Man wrote, “Trump, in 2-3 days has done what NO politician has EVER done.”

          Don’t stop there, he’s done what no man has ever done before when he was simultaneously rejected by millions of women worldwide. World record for most female rejections received by any individual. That will never be outdone. OUCH!

          When do we invade Poland?

  • January 25, 2017 at 2:23 pm
    FreespiritedMN says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 6
    Thumb down 7

    Actually it appears the galaxy has warmed up not just our planet and that has been overlooked in the literature. ‘Global warming’ is not a people problem but it appears to be either an object sailing through the galaxy and/or a stream of energy coming from the center of the galaxy. I’d LOVE to see more on that but this is NOT an EPA issue. I would like free energy for everyone though and we can do that if allowed :)

    • January 26, 2017 at 8:28 am
      TrumPolarBear says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 3
      Thumb down 3

      Yes; solar power needs to be developed, but not DIRECTLY FINANCED by the government. Tax credits for Solar power startups is sensible, but their financials need to be carefully scrutinized to detect any kickbacks to politicians. IOW, we want ‘clean’ energy, not corrupt energy development.

    • January 26, 2017 at 10:39 am
      Little Frog says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 5
      Thumb down 2

      You’re right; its a money and control problem. All of this uproar and dissention can be traced back to middle and high school. The “cool kids” and their minions are really really mad because their presumptive authority to tell the rest of us what to think and what to do has been indicted by their own failure, and are being convicted through the election process (Brexit, Trump,…)
      The sentence they fear most; irrelevance, obscurity, and a modest life. And they will kill to avoid that!

    • January 26, 2017 at 11:53 am
      Twitler says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 2
      Thumb down 1

      Over the last 50 years the sun’s output has lessened and it puts out less heat. The temperature data for other planets does not show warming, and even if it did it would largely be seasonal because they have different orbits. Neptune has had 1 of its years since being discovered in 1846, Neptune takes 146 years to orbit. The claim about Mars is from 2 pictures taken 22 years apart, and has been dismissed as weather, not climate. Jupiter is based on predictions and no warming has been observed, and Pluto has done 1/3 of an orbit since discovery so almost nothing is known, it would be the same as discovering Earth in April, looking at the US and saying the climate was warming in July. What you are claiming is simply false.

  • January 25, 2017 at 3:24 pm
    mightyquinn says:
    Hot debate. What do you think?
    Thumb up 9
    Thumb down 13

    Its a start to the end of that nonsense.

  • January 25, 2017 at 3:58 pm
    TrumPolarBear says:
    Hot debate. What do you think?
    Thumb up 15
    Thumb down 14

    China is still spewing TONS more carbon pollution than the US.

    Libitterals; please write letters to them, DEMANDING they stop or pay carbon emission taxes.

    Let us know how they reply, if they reply. Plese deleted the vulgarities in their letters to you.

    • January 25, 2017 at 4:24 pm
      Agent says:
      Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 9
      Thumb down 20

      Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    • January 26, 2017 at 5:33 pm
      Twitler says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 1
      Thumb down 1

      Not on a per capita basis. We are over double what they are (as of 2013). Also, writing letters to them is obviously very very stupid unless you live there since they have already pledged to cap emissions.

      You believe the data is fake though, and have shown you don’t understand statistics so your opinion is not credible on this topic.

    • January 30, 2017 at 10:36 am
      Agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 1
      Thumb down 1

      TrumpPolar, one of the crybaby sore losers didn’t like my song. Too much truth to suit them.

      • January 30, 2017 at 11:29 am
        Confused says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 0
        Thumb down 2

        “crybaby sore losers”

        Aren’t Andrew et al monitoring this site and supposed to ban people who insult others? calling people a crybaby and a sore loser is definitely insulting.

        • January 31, 2017 at 8:12 am
          TrumPolarBear says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 2
          Thumb down 1

          No, Libitterals are sore losers and that is apparent to everyone except the sore losers themselves. Speaking the truth, without insults and vulgarity will not be censored by IJ.

          Truth will only be censored by those who fear it. Thus, the prevalence of Libitteral-controlled BOTs censoring conservative thoughts on IJ comment pages.

  • January 26, 2017 at 11:31 am
    Ohio Agent says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 15
    Thumb down 3

    We should be very afraid when scientific information is being hidden from the American people. The outright lies and obfuscation on the part of Trump and his incoming administration is alarming. Climate change is an important issue for those of us in the insurance business. Our industry takes the science very seriously and has been following the issue for decades. Man-made climate change is real. Saying it isn’t or hiding scientific facts will not make it go away. Having an administration that wants to halt our commitment to reducing the man-made pollution and dependence on carbon sourced energy is scary indeed. This is not a political issue. Climate change is an issue that does not favor one party over another. It is an issue of grave importance to the future of humanity and the future of our insurance industry.

    • February 2, 2017 at 2:30 pm
      FFA says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      Hidden? Really? Only place Scientific Date is available is only on the White House Web Site? No Where else in this entire world? Never been published in any scientific journal any where?

      This just keeps dumber and dumber every day.

      How about some Football Talk? Cant wait for Godell & Brady to be face to face. He can run. But he cant hide forever.

  • January 26, 2017 at 12:09 pm
    Jadefox says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 11
    Thumb down 6

    Let me think! Almost 8 billion humans walking the earth and the activities of 8 billion humans in no way contributes to climate change? Really! The rain forests are great contributors to world wide climates and humans are cutting them down with alarming rapidity. How can there be no impact.

    All living creatures contribute to climate change. Climate change is real and it’s happened before and will continue to occur but denying humans have anything to do with it is absurd.

    Just because Rush, Sean, Mark and others deny it doesn’t make it less so. Humans have destr

    • January 29, 2017 at 6:36 pm
      Jax Agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 1

      Why don’t you get 15 or 20 of your fellow, overweight, liberal friends and all of you jump up and down at the same time and let’s see if you can move the planet.
      My money is on you.

  • January 26, 2017 at 4:45 pm
    Patticake says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 4
    Thumb down 3

    And, in other news, the sky is falling. And liberals believe it.

    • January 27, 2017 at 10:10 am
      Agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 2
      Thumb down 3

      Patticake, the more they lose, the nastier they get. They just can’t stand that we now have a strong leader in office. They suffer from Trump Unacceptance & Resistance Disorder, “TURD” for short.

  • January 28, 2017 at 4:57 pm
    Captain Planet says:
  • January 28, 2017 at 5:01 pm
    Captain Planet says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 1

    “Despite the claims of combating terrorism and keeping American people safe, it will be recorded in history as a big gift to extremists and their supporters.”

    • January 30, 2017 at 9:00 am
      Captain Planet says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 2
      Thumb down 1

      censorship

      “Despite the claims of combating terrorism and keeping American people safe, it will be recorded in history as a big gift to extremists and their supporters.”

  • January 28, 2017 at 5:05 pm
    Captain Planet says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 6
    Thumb down 3

    Every terror attack on American soil since 9/11 has been carried out by US citizens or US legal residents, not by visa holders or refugees.

    • January 29, 2017 at 6:40 pm
      Jax Agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 1

      And these terrorist attacks are carried out by……go ahead, you know; we know; we know that you know……..you’re too smart to play that kind of game. Unchecked, unvetted, uncontrolled admission of ‘refugees’ is national suicide. Just ask Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, …..etc.

      • January 30, 2017 at 9:09 am
        Captain Planet says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 6
        Thumb down 2

        Oh, I see. You think acts of terror can only be performed by a certain religion fanatic group. Well, how do you explain the acts of terror at Sandy Hook, The Charleston Church, Emmanuel AME, the Wisconsin Sikh temple, the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing, I mean the list goes on and on and on. But, those acts of terror aren’t pledged to ISIS, so they don’t count, right?

        • January 31, 2017 at 8:19 am
          TrumPolarBear says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 4
          Thumb down 0

          Those count.

          But they are not the most prevalent source of terrorism in the USA these days.

          The LIST you provided doesn’t ‘go on and on’ much farther unless you admit the problem is largely due to one specific source of terrorism; i.e. Radical Muslims pursuing jihad.

          The US is going to devote time and resources to the most prevalent sources of terrorism, and apply the most effective means of providing safety for US citizens from 1/20/17 and thereafter…. i.e. PREVENTION through proper screening and vetting, rather than enabling by turning a blind eye to the most obvious sources/ origins/ state sponsored strongholds of terrorism that was practiced by the Failed Obama Regime.

  • January 30, 2017 at 2:13 pm
    PJ says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 3
    Thumb down 1

    I am thrilled to see wasted money back in our pocket for a group of “employees” with no real worth, at least not to the government. Let them get a job in the private sector. This is the main reason that I voted for Trump to stop with the waste!!!

  • January 30, 2017 at 4:31 pm
    Realist says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 3
    Thumb down 2

    One average volcano spews more “pollution” into the atmosphere in ONE DAY than man has in 100 years, grasshopper. Get a grip.

  • January 30, 2017 at 9:52 pm
    TrumPolarBear says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 3
    Thumb down 0

    MASA: Make America Safe Again:

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/backlash-grows-against-trump-travel-002244824.html

    WASHINGTON/SAN FRANCISCO, Jan 30 (Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump fired the federal government’s top lawyer Sally Yates on Monday after she took the extraordinarily rare step of defying the White House and saying the Justice Department would not defend his new travel restrictions targeting seven Muslim-majority nations.

    • January 30, 2017 at 10:24 pm
      TrumPolarBear says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 5
      Thumb down 0

      PresidenTrump to AG Yates: “You’re fired!”

      Kinda knew that was coming, didn’t she?

      • January 31, 2017 at 10:35 am
        Agent says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 4
        Thumb down 0

        Well, she shouldn’t have been hanging around anyway, but Chucky Shmucky has been doing the delaying ruse on Sessions. She would have been provided her file folder box as soon as he came in anyway. I think she wanted to take her vacation early or she wanted to march with the protestors.

  • January 31, 2017 at 10:10 am
    TrumPolarBear says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 2
    Thumb down 1

    PresidenTrump’s SCOTUS pick to be revealed tonight at 8 pm EST will see to it that Global Warming hoaxes will be rejected through full disclosures in court, rather than in the liberal media.

    My clue as to who it will be: he has an ‘r’ in his last name.

    • January 31, 2017 at 11:50 am
      Agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 4
      Thumb down 2

      TrumPolar, these people that are screaming that Trump lost the popular vote seem to forget that Bill Clinton got 43% of the popular vote when he won against Bush, sr. He won the Electoral just like Trump did this time. That result was ok with Democrats at the time and somehow it is not ok when Trump did the same thing.

      • January 31, 2017 at 12:05 pm
        Captain Planet says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 3
        Thumb down 1

        I don’t even like Bill, but I can’t let your misinformation slide. Bill Clinton received 44,909,806 popular votes, Bush 39,104,550, and Perot 19,743,821. But, thanks for trying out!

        • January 31, 2017 at 1:15 pm
          TrumPolarBear says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 0
          Thumb down 2

          So, Clinton didn’t have a mandate, yet he acted as if he did.

          • January 31, 2017 at 1:17 pm
            TrumPolarBear says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 1

            Oops! I hit return before finishing my thought, to get to lunch ASAP…. fix needed; Popular vote is irrelevant in the USA.

            But thanks for playing!

          • January 31, 2017 at 1:19 pm
            Captain Planet says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 3
            Thumb down 0

            Yogi,
            Your boyfriend is the one who brought it up. I was just pointing out his lie. But thank YOU for trying out! Pay closer attention next time and maybe you’ll make the squad. JV still has a spot open, though, if you’re interested:

            Agent says:
            “TrumPolar, these people that are screaming that Trump lost the popular vote seem to forget that Bill Clinton got 43% of the popular vote when he won against Bush, sr. He won the Electoral just like Trump did this time.”

          • January 31, 2017 at 4:45 pm
            Agent says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 1
            Thumb down 1

            Clinton improved to 49% the second time, hardly a mandate and the same per cent that Trump got. Both did well in the Electoral which doesn’t seem to matter anymore to the Demoncracy folks since they only like popular vote.

  • February 2, 2017 at 1:30 pm
    FFA says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Man. All the people upset over a web page. Nothing better to do?



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*