“We’re going to have insurance for everybody,” Trump said. “There was a philosophy in some circles that if you can’t pay for it, you don’t get it. That’s not going to happen with us.”—————————— Simply tweek the legislation to assure that about 24 million more retain coverage, regardless of their ability to pay. That would satisfy Donald Trumps’ campaign promise and solve the problem. Right?
President Trump has been proven to be a pathological liar. Yet his sheep will keep defending him.
He makes promises he cannot keep and accusations for which there is no proof.
I gave him credit for coming across as presidential in his address to Congress. Unfortunately, he has gone back to being Donald Trump. That is what happens when he is not reading words written by someone else off of a teleprompter.
Pathological liar? I’d say that is more applicable to Hilliary, Dirty Socialist/Communist Grandpa from Vermont Bernie, etc. who said TrumPresident didn’t pay taxes, etc.?
This Fake News is via Rachel Maddow, purveyor of MSNBC’s Fake News;
At least when you ask for proof I am able to. Now, where is your proof that Hillary Clinton and Senator Sanders are pathological liars?
March 16, 2017 at 5:53 pm
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
0
2
THAT must imply Obama was at 80% or more, and Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton were in the 90% range. Al Gore? He may be the current living leader, at >95%.
March 17, 2017 at 9:21 am
Ron says:
Like or Dislike:
2
0
PolarBeaRepeal,
And your proof is…?
March 17, 2017 at 11:15 am
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
0
1
The FBI Director Comey pointed out several instances where Hillary LIED.
He categorized it as not completely true. He’s a BILL CLINTON APPOINTEE.
March 17, 2017 at 11:16 am
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
0
1
Barack Obama appointee.
oops!
bear culpa.
March 17, 2017 at 2:58 pm
Ron says:
Like or Dislike:
1
0
That is not proof. What I provided was.
Check any fact-checking site and you will find that President Trump lies far more than any of the Democrats to which you referred.
March 14, 2017 at 1:53 pm
Jack Kanauph says:
Hot debate. What do you think?
13
9
It took Obama 2 years to force his Obamacare program through, yet Trump has been President for 2 months and he is expected to have a plan completed.
I am sure many were ready to go …. to Congress to put into typical legalese after Committees dragged out the process by inviting in many politicians to comment on each one.
So, please explain your need to accelerate the repeal and replace plan. Why is it important to publish it ASAP?
I realize you won’t reply. Your ‘request’ for a Republican ACA R&R plan to be released ASAP is just one example of many frustrated Libitterals playing ‘follow the leader/ lemming’ in a meaningless criticism of the party which won the recent elections.
Gee, you really like to include insults and put downs in your comments, don’t you. I guess you just won’t treat people with respect, will you?
Anyway, I believe Obamacare is flawed and needs to be improved. I believe Trumpcare or maybe Ryancare is even worse. Instead of fixing Trumpcare, I would fix Obamacare.
In both cases, we should develop a plan to give everyone appropriate care (not emergency room) when they have things like cancer, diabetes, etc. Everyone should get trauma care when injured. Medical providers should always get paid for their efforts and government ought to stay out of it, period.
And neither plan does that but Obamacare comes closer. And based on your comments in the past, you like that Trumpcare leaves 24 million uninsured.
March 15, 2017 at 2:38 pm
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
6
4
Gee, you like to repeatedly call for a plan by Republicans yet NEVER say why there is a need to do so quickly. I’d call that ‘trolling’, or ‘baiting’, which is much worse than the calling out I did above.
What’s more, Dems have been on a non-stop train of criticism of Republicans – – – simply because they lost and can’t act like grown ups.
March 15, 2017 at 3:09 pm
Confused says:
Like or Dislike:
5
3
Here we go again with Yogi making up his own definitions of words again. First it was “literally” then “health savings account” and now “trolling” and “baiting.”
Troll: a person who sows discord on the internet by starting arguments or upsetting people by posting off topic messages with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or otherwise disrupting normal on topic discussions.
Baiting: when you say something that is obliviously wrong. The goal afterwards is to get people to try and correct you, as well as tell you how dumb you are.
JS’s post was neither trolling nor baiting; however, yours fits both definitions to a “T”
Let me ask you Yogi, via Linda Richmond:
Do you consider a peanut a pea AND a nut, regardless of how those two words are actually defined?
Do you consider Rhode Island an island just because it has “island” in its name, regardless of how an island is actually defined?
Please tell us what dictionary you’re using to define your words so we can make sure we’re all talking the same language and not just “this is what Yogi says the word(s) means, so let’s ignore the actual definition and how its used colloquially”
March 16, 2017 at 9:51 am
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
2
3
@Confused; enjoy your solo journey down a rabbit hole.
March 16, 2017 at 5:58 pm
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
0
1
Some people don’t understand ACA is in an irreversible DEATH SPIRAL. IT CAN’T BE FIXED!
The Republican plan currently published is flawed, but changes are going to be made because, UNLIKE DEMS, Republicans had the courage to publish their plan and allow criticism and suggestions for improvement… BEFORE they voted on it.
March 14, 2017 at 7:58 am
Ron says:
Like or Dislike:
8
8
This is what the Republicans were hoping for so they can now table the bill and start over. They just want to kick the can down the road until the 2018 mid-terms. However, if they actually get this past, based on this report, I predict it will be 2010 all over again for the majority party.
I like the idea of improving the current offering by eliminating the provision that allows 26 yos to stay on their parents policy. Reason: with new jobs under TrumPresident, the 26 yos will have the ability to pay their HI bill, as will others whose 29 hours work week jobs will morph into 40 hour work week jobs.
I also like the improving the current offering by removing the imposition of a > 63(?) day policy lapse penalty on the premium for a
‘late’ replacement policy. The current penalty is not much different from a mandate to buy coverage… but it works differently, so no one can LEGALLY call it a mandate.
I like the FREEDOM of choice the Republicans tried to offer, but it certainly can be improved upon with a ACA Repeal & Replacement Replacement (sic).
I despised the FREEDUMB of ONLY TWO CHOICES between a mandate to buy insurance or suffer a tax penalty … under ACA.
If TrumPresident doesn’t already realize this Republican ACA R&R Plan is just a ‘first draft’, perhaps in part to troll the Dems, someone should point it out to him.
Polar, just saw an article on Town Hall that listed all the Obamacare taxes that would be going away. $883 Billion. Wow, pretty soon you are talking about serious money.
…which just goes to prove ObamaCare meant Obama cared more for his supporters and cared less for taxpayers.
8/9ths of a Trillion ObamaCare tax here, 8/9th of a Trillion Spendiculous (stimulus) there, and pretty soon it added up to serious National Debt increases.
ooops! should be ‘…ObamaCare tax CUT…’
bear culpa.
March 15, 2017 at 4:10 pm
Agent says:
Like or Dislike:
7
4
No wonder the previous POTUS increased the debt more than all the President’s in the history of the country. Had we elected Hilliary, it would have been even worse and we might have gotten to Bernie’s 90% tax rate that he loved so much.
Hey Democrats, there is a new Sheriff in town and major reforms will be coming in that will reduce Obama’s legacy to the size of a pea.
March 16, 2017 at 10:01 am
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
4
4
DEMOCRAT voters in MI, WI, and PA, i.e. the ‘Blue Wall’, came to the conclusion that if they voted for Hillary, they’d eventually have to learn to speak Spanish, Chinese, and some Arabic dialects. That’s what Dem policies would have led to.
Boom! goes the stock market! Up, up, and up again!… rapidly and greatly, unlike the tame, needed increase in the federal interest rate; .75% to 1.00%.
The Constitution is safe, as are amendments thereto. With a Hillary Presidency, we’d be soon looking at another Socialist regime more damaging than the one that ended almost two months ago.
The main problems lingering are ACA and The Shadow Socialist Resistance Government installed by Barry before he left, and which Barry now runs from 4 blocks away from the WH. Resolving the ‘pest infestation’ will take time, but they will eventually be removed and replaced.
March 16, 2017 at 3:32 pm
Ron says:
Like or Dislike:
1
2
Agent,
Please stop spreading lies. By definition, to have increased the debt more than all other previous presidents combined, the debt would have had to increase by at least 100% during their administration. That has occurred during the administrations of only 2 presidents, neither of which were President Obama.
@Ron; Obama increased the National Debt from ABOUT $10T to ABOUT $19.5T.
That’s almost a doubling…. almost a 100% increase.
That’s ALMOST a $9.5T increase… greater than ANY one past President… and ALMOST as much as all prior POTUS’s combined.
The fact that the National Debt wasn’t EXACTLY a doubling (i.e. 100% increase) or wasn’t EXACTLY as much as all prior POTUS’s combined…. DOES NOT mean his terrible fiscal performance wasn’t HORRID.
No one is impressed with your ability to refute something by claiming it ISN’T EXACTLY TRUE… when you missed the KEY point in the discussion.
March 17, 2017 at 10:01 am
Ron says:
Like or Dislike:
1
1
Actually, it increased from $11.657 Trillion to $19.574 Trillion, or 68%.
Now, that is nothing to brag about, but it is no where near 100%.
If you different numbers, please provide and cite your source.
March 17, 2017 at 12:42 pm
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
0
1
@Ron; if you think I am dumb enough to argue that the increase in ND by Obama wasn’t awful, and the WORST ever, you’re wrong.
March 17, 2017 at 12:43 pm
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
0
1
agree, not argue. bear culpa.
March 17, 2017 at 3:03 pm
Ron says:
Like or Dislike:
1
0
I will state that the increase in the national debt under President Obama was awful and, by dollars, the most ever. However, that was not what was being debate.
I proved Agent, and anyone else who claims that the debt increased more during President Obama’s administration than all previous presidents combined. Can you dispute that with actual facts and a cited source?
Please stay on topic or stop debating.
March 14, 2017 at 9:53 am
David says:
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
16
6
Just a point to remember, I currently have an Obamacare plan and will likely loose it under the new GOP plan. I welcome that. Medical prices have tripled since Obamacare came into effect and my Obamacare package only covers 60% of costs after my deductible. It was far cheaper to see a doctor before Obamacare without insurance then it is to see one today with insurance.
Polar, I seem to remember the promises made by our former POTUS that everyone will like their plan, they will keep their doctor and save $2,500 per year on the average family. Was Obamacare scored by CBO? Was it favorable? Was getting 6 million policies cancelled for people that liked their previous plan a positive thing? We know it didn’t rein in costs which have steadily escalated because it was built on a house of cards.
Nancy Pee-Low-See-It-After-We-Pass-It told the CBO they’d have to wait until ACA was passed to score it. I wonder if the CBO did so after it was passed. If they did and projected anything but a complete disaster, then CBO has lost all credibility in the matter.
Polar, so when has the CBO been on the mark with their projections? Every time I see something they scored, it is off by 50%. Are these people as goofy as some of the Algorithm experts at State Farm for Personal Auto?
March 15, 2017 at 1:27 pm
Captain Planet says:
Like or Dislike:
2
4
On what grounds, Yogi? I don’t use profanity and haven’t insulted any posters out here. It seems you and Agent are the ones who like to do those things.
If that was the case, sir, you’d be gone a VERY long time ago. I was speaking from someone else’s point about President Obama. It’s called a transition.
March 16, 2017 at 10:05 am
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
2
1
@Captain Platitude: if you think so, report me, and later report back what you were told by IJ.
March 16, 2017 at 12:02 pm
Conserving the Truth says:
Like or Dislike:
2
1
Polar,
Trump’s second travel ban was blocked. What will be done to prevent some elderly from paying nearly half of their annual incomes on health insurance? Are you concerned?
March 16, 2017 at 1:36 pm
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
1
1
@Planet; it’s only a matter of time until The Shadow Government is exposed and shutdown by the Justice Dept. and bitcoin payments, by George Soros, to online trolls, dry up.
March 16, 2017 at 1:39 pm
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
1
1
@Confusing The Truth With Trumperbole;
Seniors will be able to get Medicaid-like assistance after most of the ILLEGALS are vanquished to their country of origin. With that, Federal and local expenditures for their welfare can be re-directed to elderly, ailing, US citizens.
Got any other softball questions?
March 16, 2017 at 6:06 pm
PolarBeaRepeal says:
Like or Dislike:
1
0
You’ll likely lose an ACA policy?
Good!
You’ll get a BETTER policy after ACA is repealed and the free market is allowed to operate without government interference.
Do the math snowflakes. The percentages saved by the middle class and the upper class are the same. The dollar amounts are only presented to make it look ‘shocking’!
“If allowed to continue, ACA is expected to further aggravate almost all 330 million US citizens. Rates will rise and the people will suffer greatly. Health care supply will shrink and the USA health care system will resemble those of failing Socialist health care systems.”
Polar, Trump said he could have waited until Obamacare completely imploded and then the Democrats would have been beating a hasty path to his door wailing for him to save them. He then said, no, that is not the right thing to do for the people and is committed to fixing the Healthcare crisis and doing it soon.
We are tired of fixing Socialist Democrats terrible mistakes. Obama and his minions are being held accountable now and no amount of screaming changes the facts.
Dems are using ‘instant repeal and replace’ as their measure of failure… because they know the replacement, whatever it turns out to be, will work much better.
It’s only a matter of time until the ‘repeal’ part is introduced as a separate, clean bill, with no aspect of ‘replacement’ involved. That will pass instantly, and some, not all, of the Libitterolls will try to resist TrumPresident in some other way.
Polar, the same thing happened in the old Soviet Union under their Communist system. The citizens lined up on the street for bread and toilet paper. Those 5 year plans didn’t work out so well for them. It was an Orwellian nightmare.
Good thing we didn’t get Hilliary or we would be well on our way to the Venezuela nightmare.
It wasn’t bad for the politicians / dictators in control.
Bernie followers never had the foresight to ask him about his experience in Moscow, where he honeymooned decades ago. If it were before Reagan sank the USSR, he wouldn’t have seen the problems you described. If afterward, he would have just lied about it if any of the Millenials asked him about it.
“We’re going to have insurance for everybody,” Trump said. “There was a philosophy in some circles that if you can’t pay for it, you don’t get it. That’s not going to happen with us.”—————————— Simply tweek the legislation to assure that about 24 million more retain coverage, regardless of their ability to pay. That would satisfy Donald Trumps’ campaign promise and solve the problem. Right?
President Trump has been proven to be a pathological liar. Yet his sheep will keep defending him.
He makes promises he cannot keep and accusations for which there is no proof.
I gave him credit for coming across as presidential in his address to Congress. Unfortunately, he has gone back to being Donald Trump. That is what happens when he is not reading words written by someone else off of a teleprompter.
Pathological liar? I’d say that is more applicable to Hilliary, Dirty Socialist/Communist Grandpa from Vermont Bernie, etc. who said TrumPresident didn’t pay taxes, etc.?
This Fake News is via Rachel Maddow, purveyor of MSNBC’s Fake News;
http://www.mrctv.org/blog/twitter-just-shredded-rachel-maddow-over-trump-tax-return-story
So, are you saying that there can only be 2 pathological liars in the whole world?
Just because other people lie, it does not excuse the lies from President Trump.
“proven to be a pathological liar”
proof?
Live with that statement; you own it.
I would say having 70% of your statements to be deemed mostly false or worse is proof enough.
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/
At least when you ask for proof I am able to. Now, where is your proof that Hillary Clinton and Senator Sanders are pathological liars?
THAT must imply Obama was at 80% or more, and Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton were in the 90% range. Al Gore? He may be the current living leader, at >95%.
PolarBeaRepeal,
And your proof is…?
The FBI Director Comey pointed out several instances where Hillary LIED.
He categorized it as not completely true. He’s a BILL CLINTON APPOINTEE.
Barack Obama appointee.
oops!
bear culpa.
That is not proof. What I provided was.
Check any fact-checking site and you will find that President Trump lies far more than any of the Democrats to which you referred.
It took Obama 2 years to force his Obamacare program through, yet Trump has been President for 2 months and he is expected to have a plan completed.
Yes, but I’ve been told by people on this site who support Trump that they already had many ready to go.
Apparently not.
I am sure many were ready to go …. to Congress to put into typical legalese after Committees dragged out the process by inviting in many politicians to comment on each one.
So, please explain your need to accelerate the repeal and replace plan. Why is it important to publish it ASAP?
I realize you won’t reply. Your ‘request’ for a Republican ACA R&R plan to be released ASAP is just one example of many frustrated Libitterals playing ‘follow the leader/ lemming’ in a meaningless criticism of the party which won the recent elections.
Gee, you really like to include insults and put downs in your comments, don’t you. I guess you just won’t treat people with respect, will you?
Anyway, I believe Obamacare is flawed and needs to be improved. I believe Trumpcare or maybe Ryancare is even worse. Instead of fixing Trumpcare, I would fix Obamacare.
In both cases, we should develop a plan to give everyone appropriate care (not emergency room) when they have things like cancer, diabetes, etc. Everyone should get trauma care when injured. Medical providers should always get paid for their efforts and government ought to stay out of it, period.
And neither plan does that but Obamacare comes closer. And based on your comments in the past, you like that Trumpcare leaves 24 million uninsured.
Gee, you like to repeatedly call for a plan by Republicans yet NEVER say why there is a need to do so quickly. I’d call that ‘trolling’, or ‘baiting’, which is much worse than the calling out I did above.
What’s more, Dems have been on a non-stop train of criticism of Republicans – – – simply because they lost and can’t act like grown ups.
Here we go again with Yogi making up his own definitions of words again. First it was “literally” then “health savings account” and now “trolling” and “baiting.”
Troll: a person who sows discord on the internet by starting arguments or upsetting people by posting off topic messages with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or otherwise disrupting normal on topic discussions.
Baiting: when you say something that is obliviously wrong. The goal afterwards is to get people to try and correct you, as well as tell you how dumb you are.
JS’s post was neither trolling nor baiting; however, yours fits both definitions to a “T”
Let me ask you Yogi, via Linda Richmond:
Do you consider a peanut a pea AND a nut, regardless of how those two words are actually defined?
Do you consider Rhode Island an island just because it has “island” in its name, regardless of how an island is actually defined?
Please tell us what dictionary you’re using to define your words so we can make sure we’re all talking the same language and not just “this is what Yogi says the word(s) means, so let’s ignore the actual definition and how its used colloquially”
@Confused; enjoy your solo journey down a rabbit hole.
Some people don’t understand ACA is in an irreversible DEATH SPIRAL. IT CAN’T BE FIXED!
The Republican plan currently published is flawed, but changes are going to be made because, UNLIKE DEMS, Republicans had the courage to publish their plan and allow criticism and suggestions for improvement… BEFORE they voted on it.
This is what the Republicans were hoping for so they can now table the bill and start over. They just want to kick the can down the road until the 2018 mid-terms. However, if they actually get this past, based on this report, I predict it will be 2010 all over again for the majority party.
They are running out of excuses.
I like the idea of improving the current offering by eliminating the provision that allows 26 yos to stay on their parents policy. Reason: with new jobs under TrumPresident, the 26 yos will have the ability to pay their HI bill, as will others whose 29 hours work week jobs will morph into 40 hour work week jobs.
I also like the improving the current offering by removing the imposition of a > 63(?) day policy lapse penalty on the premium for a
‘late’ replacement policy. The current penalty is not much different from a mandate to buy coverage… but it works differently, so no one can LEGALLY call it a mandate.
I like the FREEDOM of choice the Republicans tried to offer, but it certainly can be improved upon with a ACA Repeal & Replacement Replacement (sic).
I despised the FREEDUMB of ONLY TWO CHOICES between a mandate to buy insurance or suffer a tax penalty … under ACA.
If TrumPresident doesn’t already realize this Republican ACA R&R Plan is just a ‘first draft’, perhaps in part to troll the Dems, someone should point it out to him.
Polar, just saw an article on Town Hall that listed all the Obamacare taxes that would be going away. $883 Billion. Wow, pretty soon you are talking about serious money.
…which just goes to prove ObamaCare meant Obama cared more for his supporters and cared less for taxpayers.
8/9ths of a Trillion ObamaCare tax here, 8/9th of a Trillion Spendiculous (stimulus) there, and pretty soon it added up to serious National Debt increases.
ooops! should be ‘…ObamaCare tax CUT…’
bear culpa.
No wonder the previous POTUS increased the debt more than all the President’s in the history of the country. Had we elected Hilliary, it would have been even worse and we might have gotten to Bernie’s 90% tax rate that he loved so much.
Hey Democrats, there is a new Sheriff in town and major reforms will be coming in that will reduce Obama’s legacy to the size of a pea.
DEMOCRAT voters in MI, WI, and PA, i.e. the ‘Blue Wall’, came to the conclusion that if they voted for Hillary, they’d eventually have to learn to speak Spanish, Chinese, and some Arabic dialects. That’s what Dem policies would have led to.
Boom! goes the stock market! Up, up, and up again!… rapidly and greatly, unlike the tame, needed increase in the federal interest rate; .75% to 1.00%.
The Constitution is safe, as are amendments thereto. With a Hillary Presidency, we’d be soon looking at another Socialist regime more damaging than the one that ended almost two months ago.
The main problems lingering are ACA and The Shadow Socialist Resistance Government installed by Barry before he left, and which Barry now runs from 4 blocks away from the WH. Resolving the ‘pest infestation’ will take time, but they will eventually be removed and replaced.
Agent,
Please stop spreading lies. By definition, to have increased the debt more than all other previous presidents combined, the debt would have had to increase by at least 100% during their administration. That has occurred during the administrations of only 2 presidents, neither of which were President Obama.
https://www.thebalance.com/us-debt-by-president-by-dollar-and-percent-3306296
@Ron; Obama increased the National Debt from ABOUT $10T to ABOUT $19.5T.
That’s almost a doubling…. almost a 100% increase.
That’s ALMOST a $9.5T increase… greater than ANY one past President… and ALMOST as much as all prior POTUS’s combined.
The fact that the National Debt wasn’t EXACTLY a doubling (i.e. 100% increase) or wasn’t EXACTLY as much as all prior POTUS’s combined…. DOES NOT mean his terrible fiscal performance wasn’t HORRID.
No one is impressed with your ability to refute something by claiming it ISN’T EXACTLY TRUE… when you missed the KEY point in the discussion.
Actually, it increased from $11.657 Trillion to $19.574 Trillion, or 68%.
https://www.thebalance.com/us-debt-by-president-by-dollar-and-percent-3306296
Now, that is nothing to brag about, but it is no where near 100%.
If you different numbers, please provide and cite your source.
@Ron; if you think I am dumb enough to argue that the increase in ND by Obama wasn’t awful, and the WORST ever, you’re wrong.
agree, not argue. bear culpa.
I will state that the increase in the national debt under President Obama was awful and, by dollars, the most ever. However, that was not what was being debate.
I proved Agent, and anyone else who claims that the debt increased more during President Obama’s administration than all previous presidents combined. Can you dispute that with actual facts and a cited source?
Please stay on topic or stop debating.
Just a point to remember, I currently have an Obamacare plan and will likely loose it under the new GOP plan. I welcome that. Medical prices have tripled since Obamacare came into effect and my Obamacare package only covers 60% of costs after my deductible. It was far cheaper to see a doctor before Obamacare without insurance then it is to see one today with insurance.
Speaking of President Obama, do you think he was watching me when I warmed up my soup today? Better yet, does Kellyanne think he was watching me?
Nope. But IJ’s IT security chief is watching you now.
Obama is much too busy organizing the resistance community.
Polar, I seem to remember the promises made by our former POTUS that everyone will like their plan, they will keep their doctor and save $2,500 per year on the average family. Was Obamacare scored by CBO? Was it favorable? Was getting 6 million policies cancelled for people that liked their previous plan a positive thing? We know it didn’t rein in costs which have steadily escalated because it was built on a house of cards.
He needs to be watching UW and Actu/actu as well.
Nancy Pee-Low-See-It-After-We-Pass-It told the CBO they’d have to wait until ACA was passed to score it. I wonder if the CBO did so after it was passed. If they did and projected anything but a complete disaster, then CBO has lost all credibility in the matter.
Polar, so when has the CBO been on the mark with their projections? Every time I see something they scored, it is off by 50%. Are these people as goofy as some of the Algorithm experts at State Farm for Personal Auto?
On what grounds, Yogi? I don’t use profanity and haven’t insulted any posters out here. It seems you and Agent are the ones who like to do those things.
Incessant trolling.
If that was the case, sir, you’d be gone a VERY long time ago. I was speaking from someone else’s point about President Obama. It’s called a transition.
@Captain Platitude: if you think so, report me, and later report back what you were told by IJ.
Polar,
Trump’s second travel ban was blocked. What will be done to prevent some elderly from paying nearly half of their annual incomes on health insurance? Are you concerned?
@Planet; it’s only a matter of time until The Shadow Government is exposed and shutdown by the Justice Dept. and bitcoin payments, by George Soros, to online trolls, dry up.
@Confusing The Truth With Trumperbole;
Seniors will be able to get Medicaid-like assistance after most of the ILLEGALS are vanquished to their country of origin. With that, Federal and local expenditures for their welfare can be re-directed to elderly, ailing, US citizens.
Got any other softball questions?
You’ll likely lose an ACA policy?
Good!
You’ll get a BETTER policy after ACA is repealed and the free market is allowed to operate without government interference.
Do the math snowflakes. The percentages saved by the middle class and the upper class are the same. The dollar amounts are only presented to make it look ‘shocking’!
Title of the article should be:
“If allowed to continue, ACA is expected to further aggravate almost all 330 million US citizens. Rates will rise and the people will suffer greatly. Health care supply will shrink and the USA health care system will resemble those of failing Socialist health care systems.”
Polar, Trump said he could have waited until Obamacare completely imploded and then the Democrats would have been beating a hasty path to his door wailing for him to save them. He then said, no, that is not the right thing to do for the people and is committed to fixing the Healthcare crisis and doing it soon.
We are tired of fixing Socialist Democrats terrible mistakes. Obama and his minions are being held accountable now and no amount of screaming changes the facts.
Dems are using ‘instant repeal and replace’ as their measure of failure… because they know the replacement, whatever it turns out to be, will work much better.
It’s only a matter of time until the ‘repeal’ part is introduced as a separate, clean bill, with no aspect of ‘replacement’ involved. That will pass instantly, and some, not all, of the Libitterolls will try to resist TrumPresident in some other way.
This is what happens in full-blown socialist countries….
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/venezuela/article138964428.html
Consider it a lesson to be learned and remembered. The US HealthCare system COULD HAVE been sent down this Socialist road if TrumPresident didn’t win.
Polar, the same thing happened in the old Soviet Union under their Communist system. The citizens lined up on the street for bread and toilet paper. Those 5 year plans didn’t work out so well for them. It was an Orwellian nightmare.
Good thing we didn’t get Hilliary or we would be well on our way to the Venezuela nightmare.
It wasn’t bad for the politicians / dictators in control.
Bernie followers never had the foresight to ask him about his experience in Moscow, where he honeymooned decades ago. If it were before Reagan sank the USSR, he wouldn’t have seen the problems you described. If afterward, he would have just lied about it if any of the Millenials asked him about it.