I just found out today that despite meeting all the provisions of the class action and providing all the required info back on August 1st 2016 that my claim was denied. They cited that I didnt have sufficient proof of purchase of the washer on October 21st 2003. We still have the washer and Sears and Whirlpool still have the data from which the class action would have relied on to mail the plaintiff agreement to me, but I cannot produce the actual purchase receipt. For me this stinks of lawyerly deals that benefit the lawyers on both sides but prevents the plaintiffs from actually collecting on the settlement.
Oh My, lawyers getting their fees cut. Whatever will they do?
Whoever owns one of those machines deserves to be refunded and rewarded, those things stink to high heaven!
Nice comment that Lawyers stink to high heaven.
I just found out today that despite meeting all the provisions of the class action and providing all the required info back on August 1st 2016 that my claim was denied. They cited that I didnt have sufficient proof of purchase of the washer on October 21st 2003. We still have the washer and Sears and Whirlpool still have the data from which the class action would have relied on to mail the plaintiff agreement to me, but I cannot produce the actual purchase receipt. For me this stinks of lawyerly deals that benefit the lawyers on both sides but prevents the plaintiffs from actually collecting on the settlement.