Going outside the main topic of this article, i.e. the merger, the author throws in a biased comment at the end of the article. The claim that 20 million Americans received health insurance under ACA is far too simplistic a characterization of the impacts, both positive (few) and negative (far too many) of ACA upon American citizens. IF the author decides to stray off topic (reminder: merger of CVS, Aetna), it should be done with adherence to the key facts, and not cherry picked points.
Going outside the main topic of this article, i.e. the merger, the author throws in a biased comment at the end of the article. The claim that 20 million Americans received health insurance under ACA is far too simplistic a characterization of the impacts, both positive (few) and negative (far too many) of ACA upon American citizens. IF the author decides to stray off topic (reminder: merger of CVS, Aetna), it should be done with adherence to the key facts, and not cherry picked points.
Polar, wonder how that Open Enrollment will go this time. Probably lower than prior years, I suspect.