IJ, when are you going to stop publishing these “hoaxer” stories? The arctic is cold indeed and the cold temperatures in the US are the result of cold fronts blowing down from the Arctic.
Give us a break, please.
What do those 98% of Climate Scientists agree on:
The Earth is Warming? (The Climate is always changing since he beginning of Earth.)
Man is Partially Responsible? Some of it is Natural?
Man is Entirely Responsible? None of it is Natural?
The Oceans will rise 1 foot?
The Oceans will rise 3 feet?
All of mankind will die due to Global Warming?
A few people will die?
There is nothing we can do about it?
There is little we can do about it?
We don’t know what to do about it?
We can fix it tomorrow by driving a Tesla?
We can’t fix it without crushing the Global Economy?
i think you got down voted because your other posts show you clearly have no real intent to learn the answers to those questions and will just poo-poo away any argument that is not completely in line with your current stance
March 17, 2018 at 8:26 am
DNCs Coll(F)usion GPShip Strzok an IceberGowdy says:
Like or Dislike:
1
7
Yes, let’s take the word of 98% of a subset of ‘climate scientists’ over the word of … millions of (‘general’) scientists who don’t have a political agenda, nor a desire to earn grant money to study and study and study and study and study climate changes… without arriving at a credible answer derived from credible, uncensored / unaltered data.
DNCs Coll(F)usion GPShip Strzok an IceberGowdy says:
Like or Dislike:
0
5
PS Agent is not the only person holding his beliefs, which are based on scientists’ studies, and reviews of other studies by the same, and other, scientists.
How about the 99% of the world who agrees that this is an issue and even formed an accord to help combat the long term dangers? They seem to agree that this is a real issue.
Climate scientists and 98%. Where did the 98% come from…..? That’s a number made up without any validation. Weather forecasters can not get the weather predicted correct for next week but apparently they know what causes what with 100 percent accuracy…..?Just like 98% Economists can not predict a stock market crash either….
George Orwell was right only a little late. In the world of “Doublethink,” which means the ability to hold two contrary thoughts in your head at once and believe them both, we are seeing cold temperatures because the planet is warming. What will they think of next?
You reference works of intelligence and great satire, and yet, you cannot see past your own nose.
Warm Great Lakes caused increased precipitation that dropped 50 inches of snow on Erie, PA in 3 days. Warm polar climates do the same thing for Noreasters.
Why do people with zero science literacy fall all over themselves to comment authoritatively on scientific matters? That it truly the question of our time.
DNCs Coll(F)usion GPShip Strzok an IceberGowdy says:
Like or Dislike:
0
5
‘Zero literacy’ = hyperbole intended to discredit those who hold opposing opinions that have merit, and which cannot be, and have not been, refuted with credible data or studies.
and I would stand by that comment entirely. It is self-evident reading the comment sections who holds even a high school level understanding of science.
Thanks to the American school system, that number is shockingly low.
The irony of a middle-aged white man who claimed to be a black conservative man who lost his son to marijuana abuse asking why he should take someone seriously is not lost on us, buddy. :)
To understand how real Climate Science works, look at opening picture in Google Earth.
NOAA picture shows northern hemisphere with no Ice on Arctic Ocean.
Green Zealott scientests simply photoshop out reality to hype their Fake Science.
Bill Price
Meanwhile bookings are still available on the Crystal Voyager for this years trans Arctic cruise on a 2,000 bed luxury cruise liner, only cost US$26,000. Completely standard Cruise Liner doing it’s third or fourth annual commercial tourist cruise.
Or then maybe get a job on one of the freighters or oil tankers taking the short cut through the Arctic, if you have really wealthy friends with their own big time Luxury craft, maybe you could get them to join all the other private trips ,transversing or circumnavigating the Arctic.
I will admit I have been hunting the archives to find ads for commercial cruises traversing the Arctic even during the n1920’s and 30’s when people were really rich and indulging in all sorts of extravagances – not a hint of an Arctic cruise mentioned
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
IJ, when are you going to stop publishing these “hoaxer” stories? The arctic is cold indeed and the cold temperatures in the US are the result of cold fronts blowing down from the Arctic.
Give us a break, please.
you have no idea what you are talking about on this topic. stop posting gobbledygook
Yes, let’s take the word of an insurance agent over that of 98% of climate scientists.
What do those 98% of Climate Scientists agree on:
The Earth is Warming? (The Climate is always changing since he beginning of Earth.)
Man is Partially Responsible? Some of it is Natural?
Man is Entirely Responsible? None of it is Natural?
The Oceans will rise 1 foot?
The Oceans will rise 3 feet?
All of mankind will die due to Global Warming?
A few people will die?
There is nothing we can do about it?
There is little we can do about it?
We don’t know what to do about it?
We can fix it tomorrow by driving a Tesla?
We can’t fix it without crushing the Global Economy?
Hey Down Voters: I asked legitimate scientific questions about Climate Change. And none of you Down Voters can answer these questions? Hello?
Don’t you care about the Planet? If so, tell me which of the questions have answers from 98% of Climate Scientists, and what exactly are the answers.
I won’t wait up . . .
i think you got down voted because your other posts show you clearly have no real intent to learn the answers to those questions and will just poo-poo away any argument that is not completely in line with your current stance
Yes, let’s take the word of 98% of a subset of ‘climate scientists’ over the word of … millions of (‘general’) scientists who don’t have a political agenda, nor a desire to earn grant money to study and study and study and study and study climate changes… without arriving at a credible answer derived from credible, uncensored / unaltered data.
PS Agent is not the only person holding his beliefs, which are based on scientists’ studies, and reviews of other studies by the same, and other, scientists.
How about the 99% of the world who agrees that this is an issue and even formed an accord to help combat the long term dangers? They seem to agree that this is a real issue.
99%?! That’s Fake News!
you’re right, it is fake news! 2 divided by 195 = 97.5%, rounded up = 98%. ??? was waaaaaay off adding an extra 1% there. good catch (end sarcasm)
Agent,
You are simply dead wrong on this one:
http://www.newsweek.com/freakish-warming-causes-arctic-temperatures-rise-nearly-40-degrees-above-822098
You should be the one giving us a break, please.
Climate scientists and 98%. Where did the 98% come from…..? That’s a number made up without any validation. Weather forecasters can not get the weather predicted correct for next week but apparently they know what causes what with 100 percent accuracy…..?Just like 98% Economists can not predict a stock market crash either….
Sally,
Can you tell the class the difference between weather and climate?
George Orwell was right only a little late. In the world of “Doublethink,” which means the ability to hold two contrary thoughts in your head at once and believe them both, we are seeing cold temperatures because the planet is warming. What will they think of next?
You reference works of intelligence and great satire, and yet, you cannot see past your own nose.
Warm Great Lakes caused increased precipitation that dropped 50 inches of snow on Erie, PA in 3 days. Warm polar climates do the same thing for Noreasters.
Why do people with zero science literacy fall all over themselves to comment authoritatively on scientific matters? That it truly the question of our time.
‘Zero literacy’ = hyperbole intended to discredit those who hold opposing opinions that have merit, and which cannot be, and have not been, refuted with credible data or studies.
Sorry,
should have said “remedial science literacy.”
and I would stand by that comment entirely. It is self-evident reading the comment sections who holds even a high school level understanding of science.
Thanks to the American school system, that number is shockingly low.
Condescension in place of discussion. Sounds like more hot air from another lefty.
Answer my questions above, in an intelligent, honest way.
You won’t. Revealing exactly what about your science literacy?
Sure. Let me go waste 20 minutes of my life educating the uneducatable and the deliberately ignorant.
It wouldn’t benefit either of us.
By the way, you didn’t ask questions. U made statements and put question marks on the end of them for some reason.
Insults instead of insight. Tell me again why anyone should take you seriously?
The irony of a middle-aged white man who claimed to be a black conservative man who lost his son to marijuana abuse asking why he should take someone seriously is not lost on us, buddy. :)
And there you have the perfect explanation of Climate Change.
Because you “believe in science”.
Keep on making us laugh . . . or look in the mirror and do it for yourself.
Clown.
Craig Cornell says:
LIKE OR DISLIKE:
Thumb up 0Thumb down 2
Insults instead of insight. Tell me again why anyone should take you seriously?
MARCH 14, 2018 AT 6:22 PM
Craig Cornell says:
LIKE OR DISLIKE:
0
0
I know this is getting pretty heady for you, but give thinking a try . . .
MARCH 14, 2018 AT 11:28 AM
Craig Cornell says:
LIKE OR DISLIKE:
1
1
I can’t figure out if you are ignorant or just dishonest. Both?
Craig Cornell says:
LIKE OR DISLIKE:
0
1
Keep on making us laugh . . . or look in the mirror and do it for yourself.
Clown.
They hypocrisy is STRONG in this one!
HA! These never get old Captain!! Love it!
To understand how real Climate Science works, look at opening picture in Google Earth.
NOAA picture shows northern hemisphere with no Ice on Arctic Ocean.
Green Zealott scientests simply photoshop out reality to hype their Fake Science.
Bill Price
OK use JAXA – the Japanese aerospace site, they use their own Himawari Satellite
Meanwhile bookings are still available on the Crystal Voyager for this years trans Arctic cruise on a 2,000 bed luxury cruise liner, only cost US$26,000. Completely standard Cruise Liner doing it’s third or fourth annual commercial tourist cruise.
Or then maybe get a job on one of the freighters or oil tankers taking the short cut through the Arctic, if you have really wealthy friends with their own big time Luxury craft, maybe you could get them to join all the other private trips ,transversing or circumnavigating the Arctic.
I will admit I have been hunting the archives to find ads for commercial cruises traversing the Arctic even during the n1920’s and 30’s when people were really rich and indulging in all sorts of extravagances – not a hint of an Arctic cruise mentioned