Gotta love Big Z.
He says he is totally open to regulation. (Oh, what a guy!)
Wait, why doesn’t he just implement the controls he has in mind without waiting for the government to force him to implement controls with regulations? What is he waiting for?
(Apparently, a suit and tie is okay when your company’s reputation is in trouble. But for regular people, that T-shirt and jeans act shows how “non-corporate” a billionaire can be.)
Craig, I think taking down Diamond & Silk’s page with their 1.2 million followers and calling them a danger to society was the last straw for me. I am not sure Zuckerberg is capable of not being biased. The government will be forced to monitor him with their best geek and if this continues, break them up or put them out of business.
Agent; once Congress exposes more of Zucks bias in regard to how Fecesbook operates, he’ll lose subscribers, thus FB will lose revenue from selling data of unwitting member/ subscribers to 3rd parties.
IF anyone who subscribed to that cesspool thinks for a microsecond about how Fecesbook generates revenue without charging membership fees, they’ll have an ‘Aha!’ moment and realize they’ve been duped. Then Zuck will … lose… face.
I could care less about Zuckerberg. On the other had I have no sympathy for people who post and share family photos, political opinions, birthdays, and other personal information on FB. It’s not uncommon for people to “friend” casual acquaintances or people they barely know just to increase their FB count. What do they expect? Sorry but I’m not weak enough for some FB feed to influence my vote and I don’t need Senators to help me with it either. The knuckleheads could be doing something else with their time and my tax dollars. Or they could address the robo calls I get on my cell phone – that would be nice.
Gotta love Big Z.
He says he is totally open to regulation. (Oh, what a guy!)
Wait, why doesn’t he just implement the controls he has in mind without waiting for the government to force him to implement controls with regulations? What is he waiting for?
(Apparently, a suit and tie is okay when your company’s reputation is in trouble. But for regular people, that T-shirt and jeans act shows how “non-corporate” a billionaire can be.)
Craig, I think taking down Diamond & Silk’s page with their 1.2 million followers and calling them a danger to society was the last straw for me. I am not sure Zuckerberg is capable of not being biased. The government will be forced to monitor him with their best geek and if this continues, break them up or put them out of business.
Agent; once Congress exposes more of Zucks bias in regard to how Fecesbook operates, he’ll lose subscribers, thus FB will lose revenue from selling data of unwitting member/ subscribers to 3rd parties.
IF anyone who subscribed to that cesspool thinks for a microsecond about how Fecesbook generates revenue without charging membership fees, they’ll have an ‘Aha!’ moment and realize they’ve been duped. Then Zuck will … lose… face.
I could care less about Zuckerberg. On the other had I have no sympathy for people who post and share family photos, political opinions, birthdays, and other personal information on FB. It’s not uncommon for people to “friend” casual acquaintances or people they barely know just to increase their FB count. What do they expect? Sorry but I’m not weak enough for some FB feed to influence my vote and I don’t need Senators to help me with it either. The knuckleheads could be doing something else with their time and my tax dollars. Or they could address the robo calls I get on my cell phone – that would be nice.