Court Says Trump Administration Must Implement Chemical Safety Rule

By | August 20, 2018

  • August 20, 2018 at 8:16 am
    PolarBeaRepeal says:
    Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 2
    Thumb down 16

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  • August 20, 2018 at 8:24 am
    PolarBeaRepeal says:
    Hot debate. What do you think?
    Thumb up 7
    Thumb down 14

    The author failed to challenge in any way the validity of this court ruling in regard to safety of first responders. The former EPA chief pointed out the flaw by focusing on the PREVENTION aspect, which would not be impacted in any significant way by the Obama Admin regulation. The Court argued on the basis of SAFETY of first responders and firefighters, which is an invalid issue as regards the subject regulation; i.e. there will be accidents regardless of the source of the accident, whether by arson or unavoidable causes. It is most likely to be over-turned when it is appealed before a responsible, unbiased court.

    • August 20, 2018 at 8:25 am
      PolarBeaRepeal says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 2
      Thumb down 11

      correction: ‘The Court argued’ should read ‘The Court ruled’. Bear culpa.

      • August 20, 2018 at 2:38 pm
        Agent says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 4
        Thumb down 9

        Getting rid of Obama era regulations is the prime goal of our great President. Sorry, naysayers, you have nothing.

        • August 24, 2018 at 7:55 am
          Ron says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 5
          Thumb down 0

          Yes. Because getting rid of regulations that protect lives and the environment is what God would want.

          • August 24, 2018 at 11:15 am
            Captain Planet says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 2
            Thumb down 0

            It’s what Supply Side Jesus would want.

          • August 24, 2018 at 12:25 pm
            ??? says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 1
            Thumb down 0

            Republican Jesus

  • August 20, 2018 at 4:12 pm
    MadDog says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 4
    Thumb down 2

    Hip! Hip! Hooray!!!

  • August 24, 2018 at 7:15 am
    PolarBeaRepeal says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    It’s only a matter of time until this reaches a higher court with some sensibility that this ruling is reversed.

  • August 26, 2018 at 8:30 pm
    cassandra says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I am fed up with the Trump administration getting credit for reducing “burdensome regulations.” Most of what makes the headlines that Trump’s minions are expunging are truly in the interest of public safety and environmental safety. All this is totally arbitrary and not based on scientific fact but looks like payback for big bucks corporations. This is an administration that will not admit human activity has an effect on climate, that climate change poses risks to humans. This is an administration that casts its lot with antiquated technology in order to boost the fossil m fuel industry and the coal industry and give payback. This administration seeks to despoil the last remaining pristine areas that humans have not yet defiled. REALLY…we need to drill in the Arctic Refuge area? Let Pebble mine crap up the largest salmon run on earth…for gold? REALLY? Not to mention the leasing or sale of our national lands at bargain basement prices to big mining, big logging, et, al. Why? Defile TX, LA, WY, and OK…they seem to not mind. Stop defiling new lands…especially our national heritage lands..



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*