American Economists’ Work on Climate Change, Benefits of Technology Earn Nobel Prize

By Simon Johnson and Niklas Pollard | October 9, 2018

  • October 9, 2018 at 5:01 pm
    PolarBeaRepeal says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 3
    Thumb down 5

    Yes, there is Climate Change. No, it is not significantly impacted by human actions. No, we do not need to try to change the nature of climate change. Yes, we may need to adapt to new environmental conditions.

    Let the liberals who seek to tax us to establish more control over our lives and set aside a slush fund for THEIR political agendas disprove my second statement. Ready, steady, …GO!

  • October 9, 2018 at 6:18 pm
    It's A Conspiracy says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 6
    Thumb down 1

    Hmmm, do I listen to the Nobel Prize winning scientists, or the angry right-winger on a community forum. This is really a tough choice. I know, I will check in with the other 97% of the world’s climate scientists. Surely they must know something about the Earth’s climate.

    • October 10, 2018 at 10:08 am
      Agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 4

      Talk to the hand Conspiracy. Disgraced scientists have been floating their Global Warming/Climate change hoaxer story for years now without success. I couldn’t care less about the Nobel since they have been giving their prizes to lefties for years. Remember when they gave the Peace Prize to our former POTUS for doing absolutely nothing. All agenda all the time.

      • October 10, 2018 at 10:58 am
        Science is a Trick says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 4
        Thumb down 0

        Empirical evidence and peer reviewed data and studies published in scientific journals is all a liberal trick to get you to take care of the planet for future generations. Anyone who tries to do their part is a moron. It’s amazing how dumb you sound.

        • October 10, 2018 at 2:24 pm
          Agent says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 0
          Thumb down 4

          You left out “Faked Empirical Evidence” Studies in scientific journals supporting hoaxes are not to be believed. Talk to the hand!

          • October 10, 2018 at 5:46 pm
            helpingout says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 4
            Thumb down 0

            Agent,
            You refer to fake studies all the time about other subjects. Also fake empirical evidence I believe you mean statistically insignificant, I have been trying to teach you about this important concept for months now. Many are not “faked” and ARE peer reviewed often by people way more intelligent then anyone on here in the realm of science. What advanced scientific degree (even something in mathematics, ie statistics or actuarial science, would do so we know you can administer a study properly) do you have? If none, please do not try to push your again false agenda.

    • October 15, 2018 at 10:40 am
      PolarBeaRepeal says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      I see you’ve resorted to name calling (angry right-winger) to try to support your position… instead of actually, uh, supporting your position. The Climate Scientists who win NPPs are not credible per recent revelations; i.e. data censored, data created to support their agenda, etc. See how I avoided name calling and spoke to the truth of the issue? Civility; it’s what’s we need now…. so stop following Antifa and Socialists like Mad Maxine.

  • October 11, 2018 at 2:03 pm
    J.S. says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Yet another story where people who don’t have anything intelligent to offer on the topic are spouting off on their political opinions. Will it never end?

    • October 15, 2018 at 8:46 am
      ??? says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      No, not while there are willfully ignorant people out there.

      • October 15, 2018 at 10:41 am
        PolarBeaRepeal says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 0
        Thumb down 0

        Correct; shame on AlGore-ithm for exploiting the willfully ignorant!



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*