It is appropriate that media giants be fairly regulated to prevent biased self-regulation of their content.
Liberals will agree that conservatives comments should be more strictly regulated, especially so after the Cambridge Analytica scandal, which they may argue helped Trump win in 2016.
Conservatives, especially those who support upholding Constitutional principals, will agree that ALL comments should be more FAIRLY regulated, so as to prevent biased regulation and censorship of content that one side objects to based on political agendas.
Fair regulation that both sides of the political aisle agrees to must include panels of judges that fairly represent a broad spectrum of public / political opinion. We do NOT have the appropriate diversity in regulatory oversight with the current self-regulation of Goo-gul, Fakebook, etc.
A down vote on my post means you want BIASED regulation or continuance of BIASED self-regulation.
Good one Polar. Not doubt these tech giants are all of the lefty persuasion and have been almost totally biased against anyone who disagrees with them politically.
I’m glad you clarified the meaning of your down vote. I will mentally subtract one down vote so as to obtain an unbiased count of those who want BIASED regulation or continuation of BIASED self-regulation.
It is appropriate that media giants be fairly regulated to prevent biased self-regulation of their content.
Liberals will agree that conservatives comments should be more strictly regulated, especially so after the Cambridge Analytica scandal, which they may argue helped Trump win in 2016.
Conservatives, especially those who support upholding Constitutional principals, will agree that ALL comments should be more FAIRLY regulated, so as to prevent biased regulation and censorship of content that one side objects to based on political agendas.
Fair regulation that both sides of the political aisle agrees to must include panels of judges that fairly represent a broad spectrum of public / political opinion. We do NOT have the appropriate diversity in regulatory oversight with the current self-regulation of Goo-gul, Fakebook, etc.
A down vote on my post means you want BIASED regulation or continuance of BIASED self-regulation.
Good one Polar. Not doubt these tech giants are all of the lefty persuasion and have been almost totally biased against anyone who disagrees with them politically.
A down vote on my post means that you think a condor could win a fight with a shark.
That’s not the rule I set.
I’m glad you clarified the meaning of your down vote. I will mentally subtract one down vote so as to obtain an unbiased count of those who want BIASED regulation or continuation of BIASED self-regulation.