Russian Collusion, Impeachment, Medicare for All, Open Borders, Free College, Free Day Care, Free Mortgages (for some), Green New Economy Wrecker, Higher Taxes . . . and with all the other problems in America, THIS is what the Dems want?
I would say it’s time for the Dems. to STOP hitting the bong so often to begin with. . .
Believe you have it backwards on the Russian Collusion….If you think otherwise, you are purely in utter denial. Enjoy your Limbaugh propaganda, because it seems to be working just fine on you, I guess.
Also, not all Dems want the same things just as not all Reps want the same things. People like you are the problem who think there is only one singular line drawn in the sand on the political SPECTRUM. Look up the word “spectrum”, then maybe you’ll understand a thing or two on how wide of a scape politics really sits on. Then again, maybe you just enjoy a simpler mindset of everything being black and white without a speck of grey and that’s fine. Anyway, have a nice day buddy.
before posting inflammatory comments like this that add no real value to the discussion of this law being passed, I’d make sure that my full first and last name were not associated with my comments. The internet is forever.
Everyone should post their real name. It is cowardice to make insulting comments (I never listen to Limbaugh) without posting who you really are.
Why is it inflammatory to list the ideas nearly all Democratic candidates for President back?
Seriously? And where have Republicans ever backed legal, recreational pot? No where. So my comment is completely on-point, and if it bothers you, well, that’s your problem with the Dems.
And if you can’t take a bong joke in an article about marijuana . . .
Hyperbole much? There are plenty of Republicans who support legal marijuana. Here are some names from just one article:
John . Boehner, Cory Gardner, Dana Rohrabacher, Brian Sandoval, Phil Scott, everyone who signed on to the “Respect State Marijuana Laws Act”, Tom Garrett,
The Rosenblatt Approach:
Take a limited exception to the rule. Pretend it overturns the rule.
There is NO case where a majority of Republicans in any state legislature supports legal, recreational marijuana. In fact, there isn’t even a case of a significant minority of Republicans doing so.
You make yourself look less than smart on a routine basis.
July 26, 2019 at 12:54 pm
Rosenblatt says:
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
19
5
GOALPOST SHIFT ALERT
GOALPOST SHIFT ALERT
Craig: “And where have Republicans ever backed legal, recreational pot? No where”
Rosenblatt: Here’s a list of Republicans who backed legal, recreational pot
Craig: “There is NO case where a majority of Republicans….”
You’ve now made an ad hominem attack and shifted the goalposts – you’re up to 2 argument fallacies in your last post. Going for more?
Way to Go, RB! You got me good. Next time I will be much more careful in expressing myself, for fear of the ever-vigilant word police.
You knew what I meant. You know that I know that a few Republicans support legalization. Pretending you think that I didn’t know that is so see-through disingenuous that even you should be embarrassed to be so phony.
July 26, 2019 at 2:01 pm
Rosenblatt says:
Like or Dislike:
11
4
Who’s pretending? The first thing I wrote in my reply was “Hyperbole much?”
July 26, 2019 at 2:30 pm
Craig Cornell says:
Like or Dislike:
4
12
And again! You Double Down!
I cry uncle! I didn’t state my express understanding that yes, a few Republicans support legalization but no legislature has ever had even a large minority of Republicans support legalization.
And you again make the same, exact criticism. That I wasn’t precise. As if you actually thought I meant that NO Republican anywhere at any time has ever supported legalization.
As if you actually believed it. And when I point out your phoniness, you make the exact same dumb comment again by calling it “hyperbole”, which is only possible if I truly meant “no individual Republican anywhere ever”.
And so maybe, just maybe, that’ is what you actually believed!
July 26, 2019 at 3:15 pm
Rosenblatt says:
Like or Dislike:
6
2
I do not think hyperbole means what you think it means
You: “calling it “hyperbole”, which is only possible if I truly meant “no individual Republican anywhere ever”.”
hyperbole = exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally
So me asking if your statement was hyperbole was my way to allow you to reply in the affirmative and to admit that SOME Republicans are for it and you were exaggerating to make a point.
Anywhoooo, have a good weekend bud. Looking forward to more ad hominem attacks, goalpost shifting, and straw man arguments from you next week!!
August 30, 2019 at 5:09 pm
tony maloney says:
Like or Dislike:
0
0
WE all know WHY the republications are voting on this bill $$$$$$$$.00! Do you think that OUR insurance companies, for instance TRICARE FOR LIFE will help us out at all? The United States of America put some of US where we are at, AND WE NEED YOUR HELP!
July 26, 2019 at 4:56 pm
Craig Cornell says:
Like or Dislike:
1
0
Not buying it. I say on-line what I would say in person. Hard to find any people on-line who have the courage to speak the truth – as they would to someone in person – when they use a phony name.
Not to worry. I find all of this amusing. I don’t chime in on things I am not well-informed about, like pot and climate change science.
And I find all the ignorant comments from the True Believers quite funny. They embarrass themselves with their ignorance and either remain completely unaware of it, or they are lying their buns off.
And yet you example of Hyperbole was a few names of Republicans who supported legal pot . . . ergo, that is the definition you intended. Meaning you actually thought I meant not a single Republican in the entire country, because I didn’t restrict the comment to politicians.
I know you talk here how you do offline, I believe it. I believe you don’t realize PR though.
When you tell people to use their names or be cowards it’s terrible PR. I can’t imagine you would want the bad PR.
When I say calm the heck down, if you noticed the left all jumped on after you said that. They actually successfully played hands against you which would never work otherwise.
A99 have you been to IJ before? This place is filled with Craig’s hateful personal opinions. It’s basically what he uses for Facebook, I’m guessing because no one will accept his friend requests. It also is highly likely that the admin here agree with him politically, because you will get a stern email for calling out Craig’s BS and yet he retains the ability to attack others.
smoke,tax and spend?
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Believe you have it backwards on the Russian Collusion….If you think otherwise, you are purely in utter denial. Enjoy your Limbaugh propaganda, because it seems to be working just fine on you, I guess.
Also, not all Dems want the same things just as not all Reps want the same things. People like you are the problem who think there is only one singular line drawn in the sand on the political SPECTRUM. Look up the word “spectrum”, then maybe you’ll understand a thing or two on how wide of a scape politics really sits on. Then again, maybe you just enjoy a simpler mindset of everything being black and white without a speck of grey and that’s fine. Anyway, have a nice day buddy.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Hyperbole much? There are plenty of Republicans who support legal marijuana. Here are some names from just one article:
John . Boehner, Cory Gardner, Dana Rohrabacher, Brian Sandoval, Phil Scott, everyone who signed on to the “Respect State Marijuana Laws Act”, Tom Garrett,
https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-pol-republicans-legal-marijuana-20180417-story.html
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
GOALPOST SHIFT ALERT
GOALPOST SHIFT ALERT
Craig: “And where have Republicans ever backed legal, recreational pot? No where”
Rosenblatt: Here’s a list of Republicans who backed legal, recreational pot
Craig: “There is NO case where a majority of Republicans….”
You’ve now made an ad hominem attack and shifted the goalposts – you’re up to 2 argument fallacies in your last post. Going for more?
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Who’s pretending? The first thing I wrote in my reply was “Hyperbole much?”
And again! You Double Down!
I cry uncle! I didn’t state my express understanding that yes, a few Republicans support legalization but no legislature has ever had even a large minority of Republicans support legalization.
And you again make the same, exact criticism. That I wasn’t precise. As if you actually thought I meant that NO Republican anywhere at any time has ever supported legalization.
As if you actually believed it. And when I point out your phoniness, you make the exact same dumb comment again by calling it “hyperbole”, which is only possible if I truly meant “no individual Republican anywhere ever”.
And so maybe, just maybe, that’ is what you actually believed!
I do not think hyperbole means what you think it means
You: “calling it “hyperbole”, which is only possible if I truly meant “no individual Republican anywhere ever”.”
hyperbole = exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally
So me asking if your statement was hyperbole was my way to allow you to reply in the affirmative and to admit that SOME Republicans are for it and you were exaggerating to make a point.
Anywhoooo, have a good weekend bud. Looking forward to more ad hominem attacks, goalpost shifting, and straw man arguments from you next week!!
WE all know WHY the republications are voting on this bill $$$$$$$$.00! Do you think that OUR insurance companies, for instance TRICARE FOR LIFE will help us out at all? The United States of America put some of US where we are at, AND WE NEED YOUR HELP!
Not buying it. I say on-line what I would say in person. Hard to find any people on-line who have the courage to speak the truth – as they would to someone in person – when they use a phony name.
Not to worry. I find all of this amusing. I don’t chime in on things I am not well-informed about, like pot and climate change science.
And I find all the ignorant comments from the True Believers quite funny. They embarrass themselves with their ignorance and either remain completely unaware of it, or they are lying their buns off.
Either way, not a good look.
And yet you example of Hyperbole was a few names of Republicans who supported legal pot . . . ergo, that is the definition you intended. Meaning you actually thought I meant not a single Republican in the entire country, because I didn’t restrict the comment to politicians.
Which would make you quite, what’s the word . . .
I know you talk here how you do offline, I believe it. I believe you don’t realize PR though.
When you tell people to use their names or be cowards it’s terrible PR. I can’t imagine you would want the bad PR.
When I say calm the heck down, if you noticed the left all jumped on after you said that. They actually successfully played hands against you which would never work otherwise.
Where’s the pizza?
You mean Doritos?
You mean Doritos pizza? https://www.foodbeast.com/news/doritos-crunchy-crust-pizza-hut/
I would need to get stoned and then I’ll let you know.
This is a professional forum, not Face Book, and not a forum for your personal issues.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Yeah, you don’t get around here much, do you ? Lecturing the other readers and posters ain’t gonna get you very far here.
A99 have you been to IJ before? This place is filled with Craig’s hateful personal opinions. It’s basically what he uses for Facebook, I’m guessing because no one will accept his friend requests. It also is highly likely that the admin here agree with him politically, because you will get a stern email for calling out Craig’s BS and yet he retains the ability to attack others.
if they overtax people might throw it overboard in the Boston harbor…………
If it gets assigned any number besides SB 420, there’s going to be two days a year I won’t drive.
Democrats ignore the facts. The truth doesn’t change and the truth is coming out. Carry on Dunce