The author conveniently forgot: more deaths of innocent people, especially so in states that ‘legalized’ (in conflict with Federal Law) recre-pot, due to stoned drivers and a few other causes related to stoning.
How is that the author’s fault?? The author asked 4 people in the industry for their top 3 predictions. The author didn’t make ANY predictions!
“Blame” the 4 people for not listing DUI as one of their top 3 predictions if you want, but don’t blame the author for simply reporting on what industry experts told him.
@ tRollsenblatt: the author is at fault for not asking MORE people than he did. Or, for censoring the results of asking more than 4 liberal people who support stoning.
What exactly is the acceptable number of industry experts they should’ve asked, then? 4? 6? 12? 50? 1,000? When is enough enough … when one person makes a point you agree with?
Also – got any proof that the author “censor[ed] the results”? That’s a pretty brazen argument to make. Or are you just wildly speculating because you don’t like the responses that the experts gave?
Whose calling vaping injuries the new “opioid epidemic”? Opioids are the leading cause of death to Americans under 50 and vaping injuries are responsible for what? 50-100 if that? Not saying vaping isn’t bad for you but that seems like a lazy comparison.
The author conveniently forgot: more deaths of innocent people, especially so in states that ‘legalized’ (in conflict with Federal Law) recre-pot, due to stoned drivers and a few other causes related to stoning.
How is that the author’s fault?? The author asked 4 people in the industry for their top 3 predictions. The author didn’t make ANY predictions!
“Blame” the 4 people for not listing DUI as one of their top 3 predictions if you want, but don’t blame the author for simply reporting on what industry experts told him.
@ tRollsenblatt: the author is at fault for not asking MORE people than he did. Or, for censoring the results of asking more than 4 liberal people who support stoning.
What exactly is the acceptable number of industry experts they should’ve asked, then? 4? 6? 12? 50? 1,000? When is enough enough … when one person makes a point you agree with?
Also – got any proof that the author “censor[ed] the results”? That’s a pretty brazen argument to make. Or are you just wildly speculating because you don’t like the responses that the experts gave?
Whose calling vaping injuries the new “opioid epidemic”? Opioids are the leading cause of death to Americans under 50 and vaping injuries are responsible for what? 50-100 if that? Not saying vaping isn’t bad for you but that seems like a lazy comparison.