serious question before the comments section gets taken down: Does Tylenol have a legitimate suit against Trump now? They stand to lose quite a bit of money, no?
Great question. I would opine that the Supreme Court has provided Trump with impenetrable personal protection for most any comments or actions he produces. On the other hand, I would find it feasible that Kenvue, owner of the Tylenol brand might be positioned to file a defamation suit against Trump claiming both intentional and negligent slander reputation. This would indeed be a difficult suit to defend as I doubt qualified medical experts supporting Trumps comments could pass a Daubert expert witness challenger to be allowed to testify. Such an action could likely be filed under the Federal Tort Claims act, with the US taxpayers on the hook for any adverse verdict. It might be difficult for Kenvue to prove damages, as nearly all of the credible opinions of the benefits of Acetaminophen could serve to only increase the sale of Tylenol, This would not differ from the anticipated largest ever projected audience for Jimmy Kimmel, upon his return tonight. The bottom line is vast majority of Americans will likely not accept medical advice from the guy who suggested we all inject bleach in our veins to prevent the spread of Covid
SCOTUS doesn’t protect Trump. It interprets the US Constitution without applying political bias.
Because SCOTUS doesn’t practice lawfare, it’s criticized by those like you who are ignorant of the Constitutional protections and rights of US citizens.
Tylenol warned in 2017: pregnant women shouldn’t use our product.
Tell us how they’d pursue a case against anyone claiming Tylenol is harmful when the makers gave that safety warning? The only defense is presentation of a study that showed it is safe! So, where is that study?
I do not agree with his comments. Tylenol has been around a lot longer than the increased appearance of Autism in children. My thoughts are it may be to a combination of factors including the introduction of the Chicken Pox vaccine in 1995 and other possible new additives to food or water. Autism started to spike in the 1990’s.
It seems to me that many more people are diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder today than 30 years ago. I do not know if the change in recognition is a big factor in the increase of autism cases.
In the past, many people would state that the person is weird or anti-social or assign some other negative personal attribute to high functioning people with autism. The change in awareness might also be a factor.
Correct. Under-reported, as I wrote in reply to NY Broker. Note that there are 4 people who disagreed with NYB due to political bias, and without offering an alternate view to explain why they disagree. What the $%%% does that imply?!
We all know now that vaccines do cause austism with 70 vaccines on the schedule for an 18 year old. 1 in 30 children now get autism now versus 1 in 10,000 just 30 years ago. There are soo many stories, even documented in the congressional database, it just won’t be broadcasted because its the same people who control the media.
The truth is out there, it just won’t be broadcasted because liars control the broadcast.
serious question before the comments section gets taken down: Does Tylenol have a legitimate suit against Trump now? They stand to lose quite a bit of money, no?
Tylenol isn’t a company. It’s a brand name owned by a BIG PHARMACO.
Great question. I would opine that the Supreme Court has provided Trump with impenetrable personal protection for most any comments or actions he produces. On the other hand, I would find it feasible that Kenvue, owner of the Tylenol brand might be positioned to file a defamation suit against Trump claiming both intentional and negligent slander reputation. This would indeed be a difficult suit to defend as I doubt qualified medical experts supporting Trumps comments could pass a Daubert expert witness challenger to be allowed to testify. Such an action could likely be filed under the Federal Tort Claims act, with the US taxpayers on the hook for any adverse verdict. It might be difficult for Kenvue to prove damages, as nearly all of the credible opinions of the benefits of Acetaminophen could serve to only increase the sale of Tylenol, This would not differ from the anticipated largest ever projected audience for Jimmy Kimmel, upon his return tonight. The bottom line is vast majority of Americans will likely not accept medical advice from the guy who suggested we all inject bleach in our veins to prevent the spread of Covid
SCOTUS doesn’t protect Trump. It interprets the US Constitution without applying political bias.
Because SCOTUS doesn’t practice lawfare, it’s criticized by those like you who are ignorant of the Constitutional protections and rights of US citizens.
Tylenol warned in 2017: pregnant women shouldn’t use our product.
Tell us how they’d pursue a case against anyone claiming Tylenol is harmful when the makers gave that safety warning? The only defense is presentation of a study that showed it is safe! So, where is that study?
B-b-but acetaminophen is too hard to pronounce!
I do not agree with his comments. Tylenol has been around a lot longer than the increased appearance of Autism in children. My thoughts are it may be to a combination of factors including the introduction of the Chicken Pox vaccine in 1995 and other possible new additives to food or water. Autism started to spike in the 1990’s.
Autism has been under-reported for decades. Consider that in regard to ‘Tylenol’s legacy.
It seems to me that many more people are diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder today than 30 years ago. I do not know if the change in recognition is a big factor in the increase of autism cases.
In the past, many people would state that the person is weird or anti-social or assign some other negative personal attribute to high functioning people with autism. The change in awareness might also be a factor.
Correct. Under-reported, as I wrote in reply to NY Broker. Note that there are 4 people who disagreed with NYB due to political bias, and without offering an alternate view to explain why they disagree. What the $%%% does that imply?!
Perhaps Tylenol use and other factors increased recently, along with greater recognition of autism?
We all know now that vaccines do cause austism with 70 vaccines on the schedule for an 18 year old. 1 in 30 children now get autism now versus 1 in 10,000 just 30 years ago. There are soo many stories, even documented in the congressional database, it just won’t be broadcasted because its the same people who control the media.
The truth is out there, it just won’t be broadcasted because liars control the broadcast.