Tennessee Team Sued Over ‘Human Hockey Puck’ Stunt

August 10, 2012

  • August 10, 2012 at 1:10 pm
    reality bites says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The Predator organization is totally pucked.

    But I don’t understand why this wouldn’t be a WC claim. As written, the human bowling ball was invited to participate based on his position as a minor-league celebrity at the radio station. Seems like the station should have been named as a co-defendant if he were denied comp benefits.

    • August 10, 2012 at 5:25 pm
      Jon says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      The WC carrier would successfully deny as this would be an elective, outside-the-normal-scope-of-employment injury.

      • August 13, 2012 at 7:30 pm
        The Sound Outside says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 0
        Thumb down 0

        Not so. Several years ago, I broke my ankle playing in a company sponsored softball game associated with its 75th anniversary celebration. That injury was fully compensable through Worker’s Compensation.

        • August 14, 2012 at 9:17 am
          Jon says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 0
          Thumb down 0

          And yet there are several articles on IJ alone where extra-curricular (so to speak) activities were found by the courts not to be covered under workers compensation.

          • August 14, 2012 at 9:31 am
            reality bites says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 0

            I think what we have here are state-by-state differences in WC law. Some States do extend coverage for injuries arising out of “non-job” related injuries if the employee was working at the direction or guidance of the company, including time volunteered by the employee for the ‘greater good’ of the company.

  • August 10, 2012 at 1:41 pm
    Libby says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Ridiculous! You have to know you could be hurt while being hurtled out of a slingshot across the rink on a sled into bowling balls. Where’s the assumption of risk?

  • August 10, 2012 at 2:02 pm
    Compman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I didn’t know there was halftime at hockey games. Wouldn’t it be third time since there are three periods? The writer of this article is a putz.

    • August 13, 2012 at 10:20 am
      Mikey says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      Technically, using your logic, wouldn’t it be “first / second time” and not thirdtime? There are only two intermissions in hockey; between first & second period and second & third period.

      Check yourself before you call someone a putz.

      • August 13, 2012 at 11:00 am
        putz says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 0
        Thumb down 0

        I think Compman’s third time would be analogous to football’s halftime. At halftime, one half of the game is over so at third time, one third of the game would be over. And I guess that would make the second break two-thirds time.

        But,since hockey players don’t do fractions (and apparently neither does Mikey), they just call it first and second intermission.

        • August 13, 2012 at 11:31 am
          Compman says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 0
          Thumb down 0

          Right on putz. You explained it better than I could have. That was my exact reasoning behind “third time”

  • August 10, 2012 at 2:03 pm
    original bob says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Give the guy a 2nd break here, all his suit is asking for is medical bills. It is probably his medical carrier subrogating by bring the suit against the team.

  • August 10, 2012 at 3:34 pm
    Oopps says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Can you imagine what the suit would be for if practice went as planned?

  • August 10, 2012 at 7:51 pm
    DJ says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Where were the lawyers BEFORE these brain surgeons got together for this stunt?

    Dumb and dumber for sure!

  • August 13, 2012 at 11:02 am
    Sherinae says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    They should have made him sign a waiver.

  • August 13, 2012 at 12:35 pm
    Bluemax says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Let’seview. You are going to use me as the object in a slingshot and there were no expectations of injuries. I would think the “expectation” would negate areas of coverage on the GL for certain



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*