Simple Agent wrote: “Arson’s [sic] tend to increase with a bad economy and vacant buildings are particularly vulnerable”.
Except those cases usually involve the owner of an under-performing, underwater asset attempting to get out of a property loan by way of an insurance settlement.
THIS case involves a “serial arsonist” (read the headline) setting a fire for his personal gratification and not due to any financial interest in the property.
Or do you somehow believe Pierce set this fire as a result of a downturn in the economy?
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Simple Agent wrote: “Arson’s [sic] tend to increase with a bad economy and vacant buildings are particularly vulnerable”.
Except those cases usually involve the owner of an under-performing, underwater asset attempting to get out of a property loan by way of an insurance settlement.
THIS case involves a “serial arsonist” (read the headline) setting a fire for his personal gratification and not due to any financial interest in the property.
Or do you somehow believe Pierce set this fire as a result of a downturn in the economy?