Calif. Attorney Surrenders on Grand Theft Charge

February 23, 2006

  • February 23, 2006 at 12:36 pm
    db says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Let\’s really hit this one hard and make an example out of this person – that\’s the only way this is going to stop.

  • February 24, 2006 at 2:25 am
    The Mammoths\' Journey says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    MOM\’s MATH Journey

    I just have to say sum things to Big Insurance Group, Cal-Comp
    sensation Insurance Big Wigs Lawyer\’s.

    Picking up more of your Contributions of the Museum of the Great Plains (Man) Number 1. 1966. sequence of fraud.

    Are you ready for this, LOL shittttt…

    Google New Zealand map for imaging.
    Just picture this view as the view I currently have because their looking in New Land for the 1966 medical records they already had, but choose not to disclose.

    Anyone can get additonal clue\’s by: to google up country list, look for codes.

    If it looks like an bone ulna, it must an ulna bone.

    And,

    This is the story! haha, to much!
    http://radio.boisestate.edu/information/otherprojects/mammoth/index.html
    Your Lawyer\’s are going have come up with alot more to stop me…

    Here\’s the wonderful picture of site reference to Orangevale, Grangeville
    GO LA…Dodger\’s! P.S. Meet me the next Time for a Monday Morning Conference, I\’ll where that same ole 1996 LA baseball hat again!

    Apartment #10.

    http://radio.boisestate.edu/information/otherprojects/mammoth/skeleton.html

    Stay out of my son\’s toy box too!

    Clue\’s for tomorrow: horizonhobby
    Clue\’s for Saturady: Baseball Row clue\’s. (Your Math)

  • February 24, 2006 at 3:35 am
    To Attorney says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Grundfos Management A/S, Poul Due Jensens Vej 7, DK-8850 Bjerringbro. Tel. +45 87 50 14 00, Fax +45 87 50 14 02

    Ground
    Grundfros frogs

    Go

    196 2-14-96
    end to end

    1-26-96

    Couldn\’t Resist This:

    What date Ms. DK did you file your worker\’s Compensation Claim.

    Oh, that would be 1-26-96

    I see,

    Now, isn\’t their also an original copy date 2-14-96 in your possession from Kate Bennett.

    Yes, it\’s unfortunate that Kate was no longer able to handle my Worker\’s compensation claim.

    Now, DK have you any photo\’s that you would like to submit in defence of your claim.

    Thank You,

    I\’d like to present this to Cal-Comp for denying and totally, well you\’ll get the idea.

    http://www.mcs.drexel.edu/~crorres/Archimedes/Screw/packard/packard_screw_large.jpg

  • February 23, 2006 at 3:44 am
    jm says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    What? You don\’t think that an attorney who steals at least $380,000 and pays back $179,000 plus a $10,000 fine and five years probation is a severe enough example?

    Where does this crime fit on the \”Martha Stewart Scale\”??

  • February 23, 2006 at 4:01 am
    Robo says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Rip off $380,000, Give up $189,000. Even dumbell math tells me that she came out ahead by $191,000. At 68 she\’s ready to retire anyway! Some punishment!

  • February 24, 2006 at 7:28 am
    Have the Hots for Patients? says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    539/76/1344
    538/50/13+44+39
    1 26 96

    -1 +1

    Thought I should throw that in there too.

    HCA/539/76/1344
    correct/539/76/1344

    HCA heads up, more of your mix of records to prove how you allied with Cal-Comp insurance to deny any and all claims.

    Keep up the Good Work! I\’m on your tail.

    10 years +



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*