Colorado Senate OKs Requiring Car Insurers to Offer Medical Coverage

By | May 2, 2008

  • May 3, 2008 at 10:23 am
    wudchuck says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    this should be an optional coverage and not a mandated coverage that can be rejected. basically, are we not doing the same thing? here’s the issue: apparently they want to make sure that the hospitals are paid in a timely manner. hospital is not going to lose money. what happens if i don’t have it because i rejected it? then again, they don’t get money from me for my protection. at least i have the liability coverage for the other person. this rule or proposal needs to find the circle file.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *