California Appeals Court Upholds Guzman Workers’ Comp Decision

By | August 20, 2010

  • November 2, 2011 at 7:53 am
    jeremiah crump says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    There is the nagging suspicion that clear-cut, objective testing evidence that the alleged impairment was invalid, possibly faked, and that the allegedly injured worker tested over 100% fully capable of her pre-injury work capability, was withheld from the court in this decision. This same objective testing suggested that the possibility of overt malingering needed answering as well. This may have resulted in a case, objectively demonstrated to have zero impairment, being rated at 26% WPI.

    How would that have affected the Appeals Court’s decision?

    Who may have withheld this information? Good question.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*