Oh, come on! Since the employer required her to be at work each day by a certain time, i.e. 10:00 a.m., she was required to drive a car to work which also subjected her to potential injuries but those would not likely be considered a work comp claim?
Since she was “required” to take a break, hell, that is UNION rules, not the employers’? So, should the Union be partially liable due to their negoatiation of the frequent breaks each day?
I see liberal justices all over this case. What the hell is wrong with using her health insurance?
The co-pays would cost her more and there would be no “pain and suffering” payment from the health insurer.
Oh, come on! Since the employer required her to be at work each day by a certain time, i.e. 10:00 a.m., she was required to drive a car to work which also subjected her to potential injuries but those would not likely be considered a work comp claim?
Since she was “required” to take a break, hell, that is UNION rules, not the employers’? So, should the Union be partially liable due to their negoatiation of the frequent breaks each day?
I see liberal justices all over this case. What the hell is wrong with using her health insurance?
The co-pays would cost her more and there would be no “pain and suffering” payment from the health insurer.
Wonderful country we live in…