Oregon Judge Tosses Pimp’s Sneaker Warning Suit

October 3, 2014

  • October 3, 2014 at 3:16 pm
    Rosenblatt says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I was rooting for him to win – was planning on using some Haines shirts as a weapon and then blaming them for my actions.

    • October 3, 2014 at 4:46 pm
      Maybe not a shirt, Rosenblatt says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      Maybe some “Boxers”……

    • October 6, 2014 at 5:07 pm
      Don't Call Me Shirley says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      The briefs can be used as a slingshot.

  • October 3, 2014 at 3:50 pm
    Wild Bill says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Only in America could this even go to court.

  • October 3, 2014 at 4:39 pm
    bob says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    as I read the first paragraph, I immediately thought that the dirt bag attorney that was willing to represent this guy should be disbarred.
    then I see he is in the slammer and representing himself. add another 100 years to his sentence.
    this is a continuous problem everywhere – prisoners representing themselves and filing frivolous lawsuits. how do we stop it and still allow the truly “wronged” (?) prisoner to be fairly heard?
    there should be a review system where these frivolous cases don’t cost the defendant and can be dismissed before huge expenses are incurred.

    • October 6, 2014 at 12:57 pm
      bill says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      Maybe that’s it, actually – the losing party should be responsible for compensation of any incurred legal costs of the other party (within limits, certainly). Obviously there are challenges making sure people don’t accrue bills they can’t or won’t ever pay, but at least it might make people think twice.

    • October 7, 2014 at 8:28 pm
      MrInsBrokerSF says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      It’s no problem at all if we had speedy justice. It takes about five minutes or less to read it, and think about it, and one minute to reply: case dismissed!

      The problem is our system is built for expense, not for justice.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*