They should sue the theatre for not allowing Concealed Carry permit holders to have their weapons with them. The shooter deliberately passed up other closer theatres that did not have the same weapons ban, and made sure that the movie goers would be unable to defend themselves.
This is an example of the “Second Amendment right to be negligent.” At least gun owners, sellers and manufacturers should be required to have insurance to pay victims.
B.S. Mr. Harvey: the 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with “negligence” any more than the 1st Amendment does. In your twisted way of liberal logic, putting blame on legitimate business, making a legitimate product, selling through legitimate means, somehow should surrender their wealth/assets to injured parties and their attorneys. This flawed logic is no different than suing utensil manufactures for causing the obesity problem. Quit giving criminals and other evil people a pass and put blame where it belongs.
Selling ammo over the internet with NO requirement of ID should not be legal. Closing this loophole would not interfere with your 2nd amendment. Adding salt to the wound, the ammo co now suing parents for $200k court costs. This is the least of the absurditity here. Responsible gun owners agree with responsible rules and back ground check. ID should be the least of these requirements.
In a word: “Good!”
They should sue the theatre for not allowing Concealed Carry permit holders to have their weapons with them. The shooter deliberately passed up other closer theatres that did not have the same weapons ban, and made sure that the movie goers would be unable to defend themselves.
This is an example of the “Second Amendment right to be negligent.” At least gun owners, sellers and manufacturers should be required to have insurance to pay victims.
B.S. Mr. Harvey: the 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with “negligence” any more than the 1st Amendment does. In your twisted way of liberal logic, putting blame on legitimate business, making a legitimate product, selling through legitimate means, somehow should surrender their wealth/assets to injured parties and their attorneys. This flawed logic is no different than suing utensil manufactures for causing the obesity problem. Quit giving criminals and other evil people a pass and put blame where it belongs.
Selling ammo over the internet with NO requirement of ID should not be legal. Closing this loophole would not interfere with your 2nd amendment. Adding salt to the wound, the ammo co now suing parents for $200k court costs. This is the least of the absurditity here. Responsible gun owners agree with responsible rules and back ground check. ID should be the least of these requirements.