Farmers Limits New Homeowners Policies in California, Prompting Insurer Group to Call for Reform

July 7, 2023

  • July 10, 2023 at 10:23 am
    Bob says:
    Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 10

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  • July 10, 2023 at 10:32 am
    Dan Wilkerstead says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 9
    Thumb down 2

    You had me at US Gov… They run most programs into the ground. High cost and inefficiency. Maybe FEMA and the postal service can take it over…..

  • July 10, 2023 at 10:44 am
    Observor says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 43
    Thumb down 0

    Hi Bob:

    A better solution is to allow the free market to price and underwrite the risks. The challenge with a government solution is that we will all end up subsidizing people who choose to live in risk prone areas.

    This insurance shortage is artificially created by poor regulation.

  • July 10, 2023 at 1:25 pm
    Cid says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 7
    Thumb down 0

    California’s Fair Plan : Regarding Commercial property they apply a massive surcharge
    called Brush / wildfire area surcharge = 100 – 200 % over basic peril
    totally unaffordable . This applied to areas not prone to fires and that included buildings
    with installed water sprinkler systems and fire hydrant within 50 ft. ( PC 8/9 )

  • July 11, 2023 at 1:53 pm
    Adam says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 8
    Thumb down 0

    I feel like the CA DOI doesn’t make it any easier on insurers with the amount of time it takes the DOI to approve new products or rate revisions submitted by carriers. It puts carriers in a position where they need to make a decision between writing unprofitable business or issuing moratoriums because the DOI is exceedingly inefficient. If carriers cannot charge the appropriate premium for a given risk then it makes sense when they pull out.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*