<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Obamacare mandate Archives - Insurance Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.insurancejournal.com/topics/obamacare-mandate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.insurancejournal.com/topics/obamacare-mandate/</link>
	<description>Insurance Journal delivers the latest business news for the Property/Casualty insurance industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 16:16:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to Consider Fast Track for Obamacare Appeals</title>
		<link>https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2020/02/06/557629.htm</link>
		
					<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew G. Simpson]]></dc:creator>
					<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 16:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act (ACA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court Obamacare]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=557629</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court signaled it will use its Feb. 21 private conference to discuss whether to consider the fate of the Affordable Care Act on a fast-track schedule that would mean a decision by the end of June. The &#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.insurancejournal.com/app/uploads/2013/05/Supreme-Court-580x387.jpg" length="51507" type="image/jpeg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Rejects Bid to Put Obamacare Appeals on Fast Track</title>
		<link>https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2020/01/22/555525.htm</link>
		
					<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew G. Simpson]]></dc:creator>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act (ACA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court Obamacare]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=555525</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court signaled it won&#8217;t take up appeals defending Obamacare during the term that ends in June, rejecting requests by Democratic-led states and the House to put the case on a fast track. The appeals, filed separately by &#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.insurancejournal.com/app/uploads/2013/05/Supreme-Court-580x387.jpg" length="51507" type="image/jpeg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Nixes Obamacare Mandate But Punts on What That Means for the Law</title>
		<link>https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2019/12/18/552440.htm</link>
		
					<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew G. Simpson]]></dc:creator>
					<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACA repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act (ACA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Obamacare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare unconstitutional]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=552440</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[A U.S. appeals court ruled on Wednesday that a component of the Obamacare law is unconstitutional, but dodged a major ruling by stopping short of declaring that the rest of the landmark 2010 healthcare statute must also be struck down. &#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s What&#8217;s in Latest Negotiated Republican Tax Bill</title>
		<link>https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2017/12/14/474155.htm</link>
		
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 14:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House GOP tax plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican tax plan]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=474155</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[Republicans in the U.S. Congress reached a deal on final tax legislation on Wednesday, clearing the way for final votes next week on a package that, if approved, would be sent to President Donald Trump to sign into law. Formal &#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Republicans Sue Obama Over Delay in Health Insurance Mandate</title>
		<link>https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/11/24/347871.htm</link>
		
					<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
					<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 13:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Speaker John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican lawsuit against Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans Obamacare]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=347871</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[U.S. House Republicans sued President Barack Obama&#8217;s administration over implementation of the 2010 healthcare law, saying the president exceeded his authority by delaying part of the program. The complaint filed yesterday in Washington federal court said the president unlawfully postponed &#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alabama Catholic Broadcaster to Appeal Contraception Mandate Ruling</title>
		<link>https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/southeast/2014/06/20/332556.htm</link>
		
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Southeast News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama contraception mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception mandate religious claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eternal Word Television Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare mandate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=332556</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[A federal judge has tossed out a Catholic broadcaster&#8217;s legal claim that requiring employers to include contraception in their health care coverage is unconstitutional. U.S. District Judge Callie Granade issued the order in a lawsuit filed by the Eternal Word &#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare Mandate Delayed Until 2016 for Firms Under 100 Employees</title>
		<link>https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/02/11/320103.htm</link>
		
					<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
					<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare mandate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=320103</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[Employers with fewer than 100 workers won&#8217;t have to provide health insurance until 2016 under Obamacare, as the administration said it would again delay a key requirement of the health law. Larger firms have to cover at least 70 percent &#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employer Contraception Mandate Headed to Court for Ban Ruling</title>
		<link>https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2013/05/22/292931.htm</link>
		
					<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
					<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception mandate religious claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=292931</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[The U.S. law requiring employers to provide health insurance coverage for birth control is set to come before an appeals court in cases brought by two businesses whose owners say they operate according to Catholic doctrine. The businesses, a construction &#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
