<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>offensive trademarks Archives - Insurance Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.insurancejournal.com/topics/offensive-trademarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.insurancejournal.com/topics/offensive-trademarks/</link>
	<description>Insurance Journal delivers the latest business news for the Property/Casualty insurance industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:52:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Offs Ban on Foul Language Trademarks</title>
		<link>https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2019/06/25/530375.htm</link>
		
					<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew G. Simpson]]></dc:creator>
					<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FUCT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offensive trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark protection]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=530375</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court on Monday struck down a longstanding U.S. ban on trademarks on &#8220;immoral&#8221; or &#8220;scandalous&#8221; words and symbols, ruling in a case involving a clothing brand with an indelicate name that the law violates constitutional free speech rights. &#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.insurancejournal.com/app/uploads/2019/06/brunetti-erik-fuct-trademark-580x385.jpg" length="48150" type="image/jpeg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Justices Politely Debate Offensive Trademark</title>
		<link>https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2019/04/17/524067.htm</link>
		
					<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew G. Simpson]]></dc:creator>
					<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FUCT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offensive trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court trademarks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=524067</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court justices tiptoed around the offensive word at the center of a free speech case on Monday as they considered a challenge to a federal law that restricts trademarks on &#8220;immoral&#8221; and &#8220;scandalous&#8221; words and symbols. The nine &#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.insurancejournal.com/app/uploads/2013/10/supreme_court-580x580.jpg" length="86044" type="image/jpeg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Redskins, Disparaging Trademarks and Free Speech</title>
		<link>https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2015/07/09/374548.htm</link>
		
					<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
					<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 12:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disparaging trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offensive trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redskins trademark cancellation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Slants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Redskins trademark]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=374548</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[The National Football League&#8217;s Washington Redskins lost some protection for its controversial name after a federal judge ruled it may be disparaging to Native Americans. The decision doesn&#8217;t bar the team&#8217;s commercial use of the trademarked name, but it opens &#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.insurancejournal.com/app/uploads/2015/07/washington-redskins-trademark-logo--580x387.jpg" length="78771" type="image/jpeg" />	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
