I started this thread to ilustrate a current event. Getting loss runs has never (before this one) been a problem.
When I said the insured did call, I don't know why there was a response in CAPs? I was replying to another post.
My usual method IS to get a signed request letter and then fax the request (these days it is usually e-mail). This time I was running short on time for the X-date, the insured was quite a distance from me and a phone call was the most expedite way. Not disclosing your number on a fax is breaking a Federal law. Can't remember which one but I believer it was far enough that it was during the Clinton admin. and part of a communication bill. I never hide my station id.
An agent busy writing 4 other's. I've been a one person agent / broker for a lot of years, wear many hats, work long hours but it is still my duty to service my client. It doesn't matter how busy I am. So I don't care if the Erie agent had 20 apps to get done.......he still has a client that it is his duty to service. Just my little IMHO on service we agents are to provide.
I've always considered that you win business on service and of course the price of the premium comes into play. I get a bit miffed when instead of winning through the previous, agents play game. Such as the agent in question dragging his feet to get loss runs. Maybe after 25 years in this business I am now old fashion in my thoughts on how to act in business. After all, a recent poll of college grads asked the question, "is it ok to cheat to get ahead in business?" Seventy six percent responded with a yes.
Last spring I lost a client to a broker that told a good one about the services they can provide. Aside from other misrepresentations, one of the services they told my client was that they (the broker) have an attorney on staff for my client to use. What my client did not know was, the "they" is an association that the broker belongs to and the attorney is in another State and is not free. That third party use of "we" can sure be used by creative people. To me, it was a $450 a month income case. It was a group health account, taken by broker of record letter and I didn't even know it was happening. It was a 22 person shop (commission is $20 a person) plus I had the group life. The incoming broker also told the client that "we" have an actuarial service that at renewal we can present to the insurance carrier and you can get a better rate. Again the broker forgot to say that "we" is the association the broker belongs to and it isn't a free service. Plus on such a small account the insurance company has their own actuarial runs, their claims run outs, their own benefits paid out. That broker provided actuarial run is all fluff, the insurance company isn't going to change their computer runs for a 22 person group. You can always request EOB's, run outs etc. and don't need a third party acturial report. Maybe if you were a big group, partial or fully self insured, with an account that is with a Captive......you may have a case for third party actuarial services.
I was talking with a TPA that I've known for twenty years and told him the above story. He said he is seeing more and more of agents that are bending the truth more and more. When will it be that the HR person figures out that all the fluff and stuff isn't free and isn't worth it. I think it will be when the owner asks about the new invoices he sees that need to be paid.
In the years I've been in this business I always strove to be squeaky clean. There were times I lost business to the new kid on the block, that months flying star, spreading the BS to get new accounts but eventually would crash and burn. Yes, those flying stars were the exception to the rule but I'm starting to think that in the world today, there are more of those flying stars. The types that are here to today, gone tomorrow but leave a path of debris behind them.
