The Association of California Insurance Companies is opposing Small Claims Court legislation that would hurt consumers by reducing the ability of insurers to represent their policyholders in court. Jeff Fuller, ACIC’s executive vice president and general counsel, said the legislation, SB 422, would increase the jurisdiction of Small Claims Court from cases with $5,000 in damages to cases with $7,500 in damages. Because attorneys–and insurers–cannot represent clients in Small Claims Court proceedings, SB 422 would reduce the number of cases in which insurers would be able to defend their policyholders. The Senate-approved bill by Sen. Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto) is scheduled to be heard next by the Assembly Judiciary Committee. “Policyholders, under this bill, will suffer,” Fuller said. “First, insurers would be unable to meet their contractual obligations to defend their policyholders. Second, consumers would be deprived of a benefit under their insurance policies for which they pay a premium.” If SB 422 becomes law, insurers likely will have little choice but to appeal Small Claims Court decisions that they feel are questionable. In such appeals to Superior Court, insurers would be able to represent their policyholders. “The number of such appeals would increase substantially, which in turn will result in higher costs to the judicial system–precisely the opposite effect of the intended purpose of operating small claims courts in the first place,” Fuller said.
Free Newsletters
Most Popular
- Liberty Mutual Appoints Northeast Division VP for Commercial Insurance
- Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
- N.Y. Assemblyman Takes Aim at Anti-Concurrent Causation Clauses
- Wisconsin Police Aggressive in Redacting Accident Reports
- DriveID Can Block or Track Driver’s Mobile Use
- 50 Top Apps for Independent Agents
- Montana Man Deliberately Crashes Into Insurance Office
- Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
- 10 Things to Know About the Trucking Industry
- Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
- GOP Questions Fundraising for ObamacareMay 21, 2013 | Comments (81)
- Employer Contraception Mandate Headed to Court for Ban RulingMay 22, 2013 | Comments (18)
- Montana Man Deliberately Crashes Into Insurance OfficeMay 17, 2013 | Comments (16)
- Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. EmployersMay 21, 2013 | Comments (11)
- Boogaard Family Sues NHL for Son’s DeathMay 17, 2013 | Comments (5)
Current Issue
Partner Center
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
Quote of Note
There are still a few missing pieces to the puzzle. With some work over the next years, I think there is going to be a significant improvement in the ability to allow banks to fail.
More QuotesDarrell Duffie, finance professor at Stanford University business school.



Oklahoma Schools Destroyed by Tornado Lacked ‘Safe Rooms’
Connecticut Court Rules That Lawyers Can’t Be Sued for Fraud
Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
Risk Retention Groups Show Strong Financial Stability: Demotech
Washington Man Gets $1,103 Speeding Ticket in Oregon
The Time is Now for Agent Licensing Reform
Montana Enacts Insurance Compact Legislation


