A Roanoke judge should not have thrown out an award of more than $110,000 to a woman who suffered food poisoning from a restaurant meal of beef tips and rice, the Virginia Supreme Court has ruled.
The high court reinstated Susie Bussey’s verdict against a Golden Corral in Roanoke. Last year, a jury found the restaurant negligent and awarded Bussey $111,765.25.
Evidence showed that Bussey became ill after eating lunch at the restaurant in March 2002. Bussey noticed at the time that the beef she was served smelled bad, the Supreme Court noted, and the manager confirmed that it was “no good.”
Although Bussey stopped eating, she spent four days in the hospital with what her doctor testified was food poisoning. The ailment aggravated Bussey’s pre-existing blood disorder and caused health problems that eventually forced her to quit her job as a hospital housekeeper, the jury was told.
But Circuit Judge Charlie Dorsey later threw out the verdict, ruling that testimony from the doctor and other witnesses was insufficient. In reversing that decision, the Supreme Court found the evidence to be “neither speculative nor scant.”
Daredevil CEOs May Put Companies at Risk
California Independent Contractor Law May Be Liability for Agents, Brokers
North Carolina Continues Auto Regulation Debate As Rates Stay Same for 2012
Long-time California Lobbyist Looks to 2012 Legislation Affecting Insurance
Mine Safety Chief Seeks to End Complacency Over Safety
Virginia Court Grants Rehearing of Global Warming Claims Case
Woman Takes Honda to Small-Claims, Wins Big
Federal Insurance Office Says Overdue Regulation Report Still Weeks Away
