Evaluation of the New Hampshire floods of May 2006 and April 2007 show that they were caused by different events.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency says that the May 2006 flooding was unusual because of the sheer volume of rainfall, which ranged from 6 inches inland to over 14 inches along the Seacoast over a two-day period. The region normally gets about 3.5 inches of rain in an average spring month.
FEMA says the April 2007 event was unusual because of the combination of heavy rainfall, which ranged from 4 to 8 inches across south-central and southeastern New Hampshire, and rapidly melting snow.
The evaluation, requested by Gov. John Lynch, recommended several actions to prevent future flood damage, including: improved floodplain management; improved flood forecasting; and a watershed approach to flood operations.


Banks Still Face Legal Claims After $25 Billion Settlement
MF Global Judge to Examine Insurance Payments for Former Executives
Daredevil CEOs May Put Companies at Risk
California Independent Contractor Law May Be Liability for Agents, Brokers
North Carolina Continues Auto Regulation Debate As Rates Stay Same for 2012
Long-time California Lobbyist Looks to 2012 Legislation Affecting Insurance
Mine Safety Chief Seeks to End Complacency Over Safety
Virginia Court Grants Rehearing of Global Warming Claims Case


