Regulators Examining Insurers’ Cyber Security Readiness
Immigrant Driver’s Licenses Signed in Colorado
E&O Insights: Why Personal Umbrellas Generate Claims
10 Things to Know About Entertainment, Sports & Special Events
Washington Public Employee Fired Over Fruit Pie Suing City
4 Strategies to Make Producer Lifecycle Management a Priority
Motorcycle Injuries Rise After Helmet Laws Weakened: Study
Making the Most of Mediation, Part 2Free Newsletters
Sign up to receive insurance news alerts!Most Popular
Current Issue
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
Almost makes one wonder if the Feds should hold onto a larger position for a while and shoot for $40 instead of the current price.
The Fed won’t hold the stock for two reasons. One is political, the government doesn’t want to be seen as holding capital in a public company any longer than is necessary. Two is that part of the reason why the stockl is estimated to rise in value is the AIG buyback of those capital shares. If the fed doesn’t sell, there is no buyback, and no rise in value to $40.
There has been no progress at Chartis, only a name change. Does anyone doubt that Goldman & or it’s clients{in concert with the Fed} are looking to sell their AIG shares before the next crash?
Perhaps a concern for increased profitability is the reason behind our medical practice not receiving payment from Chartis for nearly the last year; them sighting ridiculous reasons why the claims should be denied just to not pay them. We are looking at a large turn-away of longtime patients just because they work at a local factory that employs Chartis/AIG as their workers compensation carrier.