AIA Criticizes Mississippi Attorney General Hood’s Lawsuit As ‘Groundless’

September 16, 2005

Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood’s complaint, filed in state court to force insurers to pay for flood losses not covered by property insurance contracts is “groundless” and an attempt to retroactively rewrite private insurance contracts according to a statement issued by the American Insurance Association.

AIA said it feels compelled to respond to legal action taken by Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood (D).

Cecil Pearce, AIA southeast region vice president said AIA characterizes the lawsuit as “groundless.” The attorney general must well know that, for more than 35 years, flood insurance principally has been the responsibility of the federal government under the National Flood Insurance Program.

This program has been available to Mississippi homeowners and businesses in flood-prone areas. What the attorney general’s lawsuit attempts to do is retroactively rewrite private insurance contracts for those individuals and businesses that chose not to buy flood insurance from the federal government’s flood insurance program. This would inject tremendous uncertainty into the insurance system, which relies on predictability and certainty in order to function for the benefit of policyholders.”

The long-standing, clear division of responsibility – with the federal government providing flood insurance – was emphasized earlier this week by Mississippi Insurance Commissioner George Dale, who said at a legislative hearing: “The industry will pay what they owe. They will not pay what the policy did not provide because (policyholders) didn’t pay a premium for it.”

The relationship between an insurer and its policyholder is determined by the policy language in each insurance contract. It is not appropriate to force any insurer to pay claims for losses beyond the scope of their contract, as the attorney general’s lawsuit seeks to do.

Pearce said “Mississippi’s economic recovery in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina will require a stable insurance mechanism. Insurers underwrite and make possible the many types of business investments which must be in place for effective recovery to occur. We have an historic commitment to the state of Mississippi and its consumers, and we intend to honor our contracts with our policyholders.”

Topics Lawsuits Flood Mississippi

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • February 20, 2006 at 12:43 pm
    Diana says:
    Dickie Scruggs is suing the insurance companies here Pascagoula had something like a 27 foot storm surge came in and I live 1.7 miles from the beach I received about 15 inches... read more
  • February 18, 2006 at 11:57 am
    Greg says:
    My family has lived in Pensacola since 1973. We have experienced many hurricanes over the years and endured numerous negotiations with our insurance companies. On 9/16/04 hurr... read more
  • February 15, 2006 at 2:27 am
    Dennis says:
    Flood is excluded in a regular homeowners policy, But not in the hurricane deductible policy. It state \"any insured loss is covered, or any (object)\'s driven by a windstorm.... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (23)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features