Yes, I hate public cameras of any kind. I think the Boston bomber, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, would have a legitimate case that his privacy was invaded. Where are his rights?
First.. Having the company that operated the system perform the “study” reeks of back scratching not too mention giving them the chance to alter the sensors received data [final percentages and speed data] to sway opinion to re-institute the cameras use… Is it any wonder TN is in the top 10 of the most corrupt states?????
I thought most traffic cameras were for red light enforsement. I know that some areas like Scottsdale have erected speed cameras, but those are pretty rare. Even of this study is really scientific and objective, I’d argue that an area like Oak Ridge with less than 30,000 citizens isn’t much of a representitive sample size.
If you want a world controlled by machines, put them up. Otherwise, where are our rights?
Yes, I hate public cameras of any kind. I think the Boston bomber, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, would have a legitimate case that his privacy was invaded. Where are his rights?
First.. Having the company that operated the system perform the “study” reeks of back scratching not too mention giving them the chance to alter the sensors received data [final percentages and speed data] to sway opinion to re-institute the cameras use… Is it any wonder TN is in the top 10 of the most corrupt states?????
I’m guessing most of the people who want machines/computers running everything are Prog. agents.
I thought most traffic cameras were for red light enforsement. I know that some areas like Scottsdale have erected speed cameras, but those are pretty rare. Even of this study is really scientific and objective, I’d argue that an area like Oak Ridge with less than 30,000 citizens isn’t much of a representitive sample size.