New Mexico Defeats Unfair Trade Practices, Dangerous Dog Bills

March 30, 2009

  • March 30, 2009 at 1:54 am
    Snoop Dawg says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    NEWS FLASH!

    Insurance companies are already refusing to insure customers with those breeds of dogs. They have to use residual market in many places.

  • March 31, 2009 at 8:18 am
    Dread says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Every year those two breeds top the list of animals that kill, maul, and maime. There is no plausible reason to harbor them in a populated area. “the first bite is free” mentality is absurd. These animals are brutish, they scare the crap out of people, and you never know when they’ll snap. When they do, somebody’s life is dramtically changed or ended. The public shouldn’t be required to put up with that probability. We’re not talking a “bite” in the traditional sense. Any dog can bite. What makes these two beasts more dangerous is a repressed genetic propensity to attack, maul, and kill.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*