Free Newsletters
Most Popular
- Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
- Liberty Mutual Appoints Northeast Division VP for Commercial Insurance
- N.Y. Assemblyman Takes Aim at Anti-Concurrent Causation Clauses
- Maine Legislature Votes Down Vacant Property Insurance Bill
- Price Stability on the Horizon for Lawyers E&O Class
- 50 Top Apps for Independent Agents
- Montana Man Deliberately Crashes Into Insurance Office
- Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
- 10 Things to Know About the Trucking Industry
- Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
- GOP Questions Fundraising for ObamacareMay 21, 2013 | Comments (58)
- Montana Man Deliberately Crashes Into Insurance OfficeMay 17, 2013 | Comments (16)
- Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. EmployersMay 21, 2013 | Comments (10)
- ‘Major Disaster’ Declared in Wake of Deadly Oklahoma TornadoesMay 21, 2013 | Comments (5)
- Mom, Daughter Charged With Arson, Insurance Fraud in ConnecticutMay 21, 2013 | Comments (5)
Current Issue
Partner Center
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
Quote of Note
When someone gets hit in the pocketbook, that’s when you remember it.
More QuotesConnecticut State Rep. Antonio Guerrera

Oklahoma Schools Destroyed by Tornado Lacked ‘Safe Rooms’
Connecticut Court Rules That Lawyers Can’t Be Sued for Fraud
Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
E&O Insights: Restaurant and Tavern Risks
CEA’s First CIO Reflects C-Suite Trend
Golf and Country Clubs Weather the Storm
Midwest AGs Go After Storm-Chasing Roofing Companies



One day you’ll believe in cost-based insurance. Until then, continue to fight against consumer choice, especially that of consumers who obey the mandatory insurance law and rightly want to be rewarded in the form of the ability to take their experience to another carrier.
“Consumer Watchdogs” cry that consumers might have to go uninsured because they can’t afford to buy insurance, because they have to pay a surcharge for previously being uninsured?
IT’S THE LAW!!!!!!!!!!! BUY IT!!!!! OR FACE THE PENALTIES!!!!
For quite a while wasn’t the proposed interpretation the one used by most carriers?
I assume the Citizens for Fair rates, want to set the rates??? I also assume the insurers think they’re fair to. I guess we better get Obama involved to decide what’s fair.
isnt’ it wonderful that in CA our cars are so important to us that we have laws that say
- you must have insurance
- insurers must base rates on x, y, and z factors, and may not base them on a, b, and c, and must be reasonable given those criteria
- insurers must pay all reasonable costs at the amount indicated by the poeople doing the work (transparency of costs/coverage, usu. through 3 estimates)
wow. novel. now, i wonder why the feds are so confused about what to do and how with our medical insurance.