Well of course they did, thanks to the good ‘ol attorney who’s truly looking out for them {cough}.
The golf course has much deeper pockets than the parents of the 13 year old girl who’s charged with starting the initial fires – which in the strong wind/dry conditions, is why it spread to and from the golf course.
“May have” and “if” have come a long way when you can use them as reason enough to bring suit. That lawyer and the case should both be thrown out of court.
I was a bit skeptical when I read about the first golf club fire so I took out my old titanium driver at night and swung it over gravel – Wow, it was the first time my drive every make sparks fly!
Warning: Don’t try this in California
the official cause is “undetermined” and the fire chief says there is no physical evidence.
so what are the grounds of their lawsuit?
Well of course they did, thanks to the good ‘ol attorney who’s truly looking out for them {cough}.
The golf course has much deeper pockets than the parents of the 13 year old girl who’s charged with starting the initial fires – which in the strong wind/dry conditions, is why it spread to and from the golf course.
Only in California………….
Your comment confirms we have more imaginative attorneys in CA. Those 99.7% are giving the good ones a bad name.
“May have” and “if” have come a long way when you can use them as reason enough to bring suit. That lawyer and the case should both be thrown out of court.
I was a bit skeptical when I read about the first golf club fire so I took out my old titanium driver at night and swung it over gravel – Wow, it was the first time my drive every make sparks fly!
Warning: Don’t try this in California
Maybe a golfer farted while ligthing a cigar next to some dry brush?
“…the golf course may be responsible if it failed to warn golfers about the dangerous fire conditions.”
What a bunch of jibberish…….