Connecticut Agents’ Group Urges State to Drop Cat-Fund Plan

February 18, 2009

  • February 18, 2009 at 8:25 am
    bud guy says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Please take note: a state cat fund with a national cat fund behind it is nothing more than a massive subsidy to the direct writers. Time to wake up and fight to keep your market share.

  • February 19, 2009 at 12:44 pm
    Icee says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I must be missing something. Can you please explain to me how this is a subsidy to direct writers?

  • February 19, 2009 at 1:12 am
    David says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Icee, I would like to hear bud guy’s answer to your questions too, but I think a cat fund may be a subsidy to direct writers because if the gvt. will step in and pay claims in case of a “large” event, then direct writers will not need to buy so much reinsurance. I think the key here is what will be the “trigger level” where the gvt. will step in. In my view, and I suspect bud guy’s view as well, is that the trigger level should be so high as to not crowd out the private market. Unfortunately, I don’t think this will be the case, though. Ideally, the government funds would be there only in case a large event, or series of natural disasters threatned the liquidity of the private P&C insurers and reinsurers.

  • February 20, 2009 at 8:42 am
    Icee says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Thanks David. Your explanation makes sense if bud guy was talking direct companies vs reinsurance companies.

    But I think he is talking direct writers vs independent agent companies and in this case I don’t see how a cat fund helps the direct writers any more than it helps the independent agent companies.

    Icee



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*